Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Cosmopolis Constructions v. ACIT (2023)103 ITR 543 (Pune) (Trb)

S. 22 : Income from house property-Business income-Stock in trade-Deemed rent on unsold flats-Addition is not justified.[S.28(i)]

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)103 ITR 181 / 149 taxmann.com 77 Delhi) (Trib)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Permanent Establishment-Fees for technical services Tax resident of China-Indian subsidiary concluding contracts on behalf of assessee-Active involvement-Income attributable is taxable in India-Royalty-Income from software embedded in hardware equipment supplied to customers in India-Does not amount to royalty-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-China [S. 5(2), 9(1)(i), Expln 2,9(1)(vi) Art.12]

Rakesh Kumar Jha. v. ITO (2023) 201 ITD 565 /224 TTJ 11/ 226 DTR 97 (Ranchi) (Trib.)

S. 271B : Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Business of imparting tuition classes-Income is estimated-levy of penalty is affirmed. [S.44AA, 44AB 271A, 271AB]

Zebra Technologies Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. CIT (IT) (2023) 201 ITD 87 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalties/fees for technical services-Off-shore sales-Order is passed after detailed enquiry-Revision is quashed-DTAA-India-Singapore. [S. 9(1)(vii), 143(3) Art. 12]

Shashi Jain. (Smt.) v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 33/225 TTJ 577 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limited scrutiny-Purchase of residential property was entered by parties in AY 2008-09 even for consideration lower than market price, provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b) would not be applicable as it came into existence from 1-10-2009-Revision order is quashed.[S. 56(2)(vii)(b)]

Asian Box Corporation. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 269 (Rajkot) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Income from other sources-Expenditure claimed-Allowability of interest-Verified in the course of original assessment proceedings-Revision order is quashed.[S.36(1)(iii), 56, 57]

Bajaj Finance Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 656 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Method of accounting-Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS)-Accrual-NBFC Governed by RBI was not required to recognize its accrued interest on NPAs as income on accrual basis, provisions of ICDS would not be applicable

Bhikhabhai Rajabhai Dhameliya. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 424 /225 TTJ 1104 (Surat) (Trib.)/Dakshben Shailesh Dhameliya v.PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 424 /225 TTJ 1104 (Surat) (Trib.)/Ravjibhai Becharbhai Dhamelia v.PCIT( 2023) 201 ITD 424 /225 TTJ 1104 (Surat) (Trib.

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Transfer of land used for agricultural purposes-Accepted the claim in another co-owner-Order is passed after [S. 54B]

Shankarlal Thakordas Narsingani. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 845 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash deposited-Demonetization period-Assessing Officer has added 20 percent of sales as unexplained cash credits-Revision order is quashed. [S. 68]

DCIT v. Sumeet Industries Ltd. (2023) 201 ITD 154 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Impleaded as corporate debtor before NCLT by financial creditor-Petition is admitted-Pending proceedings before ITAT cannot be continued-Provisions of IBC would prevail over Income-tax Act.[S. 254(1), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S. 4, 31, 238]