Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ASB International P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)108 ITR 444 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-Comparable uncontrolled price-Royalty-Other method-Royalty payments made for unique intangibles-Directed to substitute working for other method.[R.10AB]

ITO v. Mani Rajesh (2023)108 ITR 26 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)

S. 90 :Double taxation relief-Non-Resident-Salary —Long term international assignment-Salary earned in Singapore offered to tax in Singapore and taxes paid-Salary taxable in country where employment exercised-Income not taxable in India-DTAA-India-Singapore [S. 5(2), 15, art. 15, 25]

Chennai Container Terminal P. Ltd v.Dy.CIT(2023) 108 ITR 147 / 154 taxmann.com 68 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Enterprises engaged in infrastructure development-Not involved in any other activity other than running of port-Irrespective of various income declared by assessee in nature of duty credit entitlement, interest income, reversal of provision, small scarp sales etc., any income generated out of this port would be eligible for deduction.

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. v.Add. CIT (2023)108 ITR 329 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Enterprises engaged in infrastructure development-Late payment surcharge and rebate on power of purchase-Receipts having nexus with profits-Eligible for deduction-Addition made to income of eligible unit-Eligible for deduction in respect of sums added. Central Board Of Direct Taxes Circular No. 37 Of 2016, Dated 2-11-2016.

Kirti Singh v. Asst. CIT (2023)108 ITR 71 (SN)/(2024) 204 ITD 487 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-High net worth individuals-Sufficiently demonstrating plausibility for holding gold ornaments in excess of limit prescribed by Board’s Instruction-Credit to be given for gold, jewellery and ornaments held in custody of Assessee on behalf of sister-in-law-Addition is deleted. [S. 132]

Dy. CIT v.Tapesh Tyagi (2023)108 ITR 12 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Search-loose papers-Commodity trade-Recharacterising nature of income offered by assessee-Surrendered income cannot be treated as unexplained money-Provision of section 115BBE cannot be applied.[S. 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C 69D, 115BBE]

Dy. CIT v. Creamy Foods Ltd. (2023)108 ITR 66 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Search and seizure-Cash belonging to two concerns not functioning from same premises-Could not be considered in hands of assessee-Deletion of addition is proper

Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit v. ITO (2023)108 ITR 645 (Raipur) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposit-Demonetisation period-Not explained the source of fund-Addition is affirmed.

Abrar Fakirmohmmad Shaikh v. ITO (IT) (2023)108 ITR 127 /226 TTJ 721(Pune) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposits from withdrawals-Addition is deleted. [S.92CA, 144C]

Tejinder Singh v.ITO (2023)108 ITR 50 (SN)(Chd) (Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits —Amount deposited on account of sale of agricultural produce-Department could not rebut arguments of Assessee —Addition is deleted-Real estate business-Assessee on protective basis is not justified