Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Rainbow Vincom P. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)108 ITR 19 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share Premium and share capital-Assessee Identity and creditworthiness of subscribers and genuineness of transaction is established-Assessing Officer not making independent enquiry or pointing out discrepancy or insufficiency in evidence furnished-Addition is not justified-Order of CIT(A) is not speaking order. [S.131]

Meridian Telesoft Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)108 ITR 37 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application money-Furnished names, addresses, Permanent Account Numbers of shareholders, confirmation letters, and copies of share certificate, money credited through banking channels-Addition is deleted.

ITO v. Umed Meghraj Jain (2023)108 ITR 58 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Established identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of creditor —Addition is deleted.

Asst. CIT v. Ecocat India P. Ltd. (2023)108 ITR 30 (SN)(Delhi) Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Unsecured loans-Proved identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transaction-Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition is affirmed.

Himalaya Spinning Mills v. ITO (2023)108 ITR 694 (Amritsar) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits —Deposits in the bank-Cash sales-Addition is deleted.

Dy. CIT v.Qcap Securities P. Ltd. (2023)108 ITR 228 (Surat) (Trib) Dy.CIT v. Quant Capital P. Ltd (2023)108 ITR 228 (Surat) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Established source and source of source-Addition is deleted.

Asst. CIT v. Evermore Stock Brokers P. Ltd. (2023)108 ITR 13 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Unsecured loans —Commercial transactions-Genuineness is proved-Addition is deleted.

Akash Garg v Dy. CIT (IT) (2023)108 ITR 69 (SN)/ (2024) 204 ITD 507 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation Only where sale consideration is less than value adopted by Stamp Valuation Authorities-Sale consideration is more than stamp valuation-Reference to Valuation Officer is not sustainable-Addition is not justified.[S. 45]

Meridian Telesoft Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)108 ITR 37 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Cost of improvement-Payment to sub-contractor-Not given opportunity to cross-examine sub-contractor-Payment is allowable as deduction. [S. 45, 131]

Ashok Singh v. Asst. CIT (2023)108 ITR 49 (SN)(Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Brokerage —Allowed as deduction. [S.45]