Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Hercules Hoists Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 214 ITD 61 (Mum) (Trib.)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Directed to consider only those investments which yielded exempt income during the year. [R.8D]

Hatkeshwar Mahadev Trust. v. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 608 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Specific violation-Religious community-Rejection of application-No inquiry of violation was made-Tribunal held that CIT(E) finding of specified violation was incorrect-Denial of registration was unjustified-Directed to grant the exemption.[S. 12A (1)(ac)(iii), 12AB(4)]

Shree Aath Paragana Gurjar Prajapati Samaj Trust v. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 509 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Registration was cancelled on the ground that activities were confined to a specific Samaj. Tribunal held that ‘Samaj’, being a sociological term, could not automatically be equated with a religious community or caste, and without deeper enquiry into its legal character and actual activities. Cancellation was not justified. Matter remanded. [S. 13 (1)(b)]

Divyavani Trust v. CIT(E) (2025) 214 ITD 471 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Wrong selection of code while filing Form No 10A-Rejection of application was set aside and the matter was remanded to allow assessee an opportunity to file a fresh application in the correct section code under section 12A.[S.12A(1)(ac)(vi), Form 10A]

Viswa Veda Parayan Brindam. v. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 415 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Delay in filing application-Rejection of application was set aside and remanded to the file of CIT(E) to give another opportunity of hearing to assessee.[S. 11, 12]

RKM Social Welfare Foundation. v. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 368 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Charitable activities-Object of general public utility-Rejection application was set aside and directed CIT(E) to decide the issue in accordance with law.[S. 2(15), 11]

Darul Uloom Fatimatuz-Zahra v. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 376 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Rejection of application for non-furnishing of certain details-The matter was restored to the file of CIT (E) to examine evidence and decide the application afresh. [S.80G (5), Form 10AB, R. 17A(2)]

Shree Sanand Jamaliya Patidar Panch. v. CIT (E) (2025) 214 ITD 262 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Specified violation-Religious trust-Objects were confined to the benefit of members of a particular community-Not for the benefit of the public at large-Not entitled to registration.[S.12AB(4)]

Bethany Tamil Congregation Trust. v. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 312 (Pune) (Trib.) Kutchi Dasa Oswal. v. CIT (2025) 214 ITD 272 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Second application-Rejection of application by CIT E) was set aside with a direction to decide the application for registration afresh.[S. 12A(1(ac)]

Maharanyam Muralidhara Swamiji Vedha Ashram. v.CIT(E) (2025) 214 ITD 1 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Rejection of application without considering the explanation for delay in filing application-Order of CIT(E) rejecting the application was set aside and directed to decide the issue in accordance with law. [S.80G, Form No.10AB]