Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kailash Gahlot. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 25 /113 ITR 62 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Diary-Cash expenses-Absence of specific details in the affidavit-Addition is affirmed. [S. 132]

Dipak Balubhai Patel (HUF) v. ITO 2024] 208 ITD 386/115 ITR 624 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposit-Demonetization period-Source explained-Addition is deleted.[S.115BBE]

Ravi Jakhar v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 633 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Cash deposit of 3 lakh-Returned income of assessee is more than Rs. 50 lakhs, cash deposit of around 3 lakhs could not be treated as unexplained investment.

DCIT v. Center Point Gems (P.) Ltd. (2024) 208 ITD 213 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-Disallowance is restricted at rate of 6 per cent of bogus purchases-Sale of shares-Explained the source of purchase-Order of CIT(A deleting the addition is affirmed-Reassessment is affirmed.[S. 147, 148]

Vikram N. Chandan. v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 723 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Penny stock-Long term capital gains-Accommodation entries-DMAT-Sale of shares of PS Infrastructure and Services Limited-Addition is deleted-Exemption is allowed.[S. 10(38), 45]

Vaibhav Pankaj Shah v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 718 /231 TTJ 869 / 241 DTR 25(Mum) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Bogus donations-Cash deposited in banks-Addition is justified. [S. 35AC, 35AC(ii)]

Shailesh K. Patel HUF. v. ITO (2024) 208 ITD 539/ 231 TTJ 929/243 DTR 201 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long term capital gains-Accommodation entries-Penny stock-Purchase of shares of LDPL and MARL in off-market transactions-Inordinate delay in dematerialization of those shares-Transaction is not genuine-Addition is justified. [S.10(38). 45]

ITO v. Prakashmal Malraj Jain. (2024) 208 ITD 403 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-long-term capital gain-Sale of shares-Penny stock-Accommodation entries-Information from investigation Wing-Purchase in physical form-Decartelized-Purchase was made through Banking channels-Deletion of addition by CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 10(38), 45]

Shobha Tomar. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 70 /231 TTJ 44 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 68: Cash credits-Cash deposited in the Bank-Demonetization period-Merely because assessee had deposited said sourced income in form of SBNs during demonetization, same could not be considered as unexplained cash credits.

Leela Tourism and Heritage (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 751 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Valuation of shares-Valuation of shares of subsidiary company to determine FMV of holding company-DCF Method-Addition is deleted.[S.56(2)(viib), R.11UA(1)(c)(b)]