Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Govind Gidomal Lulla v. ITO (Mum)(Trib.) (UR)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Excess Stock found during course of Survey-Taxable as business income and not as undisclosed income .[S.28(i) 115BBE,133A]

Pawan Green Channels Pvt. Ltd. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 19 (SN) (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Profits from sale of land-Contention that assessee only acted as aggregator and seller offered income as tax-AO to examine contention of the assessee-Matter remanded. [S. 68]

Ganesh Ginning Factory v .ACIT(2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib) Gajanand Ginning And Pressing Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib) Premjibhai Vallabhbhai Kukadiya v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Survey-Income from undisclosed source-Discrepancy in stocks-Excess stocks not properly verified by AO-Matter remanded for readjudication. [S. 133A, 145(3)]

ACIT (IT) v. Vijaykumar Vasantbhai Patel (2023)101 ITR 1 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Loan received in USD and deposited in Indian bank account-Investment on same day in mutual funds-Source of funds outside India not taxable in India-CIT (A)’s direction to obtain certified true copies of source of income is justified-Order oof CIT(A) is affirmed.

Pawan Green Channels Pvt. Ltd. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 19 (SN) (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Profits from sale of land-Contention that assessee only acted as aggregator and seller offered income as tax-AO to examine contention of the assessee-Matter remanded. [S. 68]

Ganesh Ginning Factory v .ACIT(2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib) Gajanand Ginning And Pressing Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib) Premjibhai Vallabhbhai Kukadiya v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 90 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Survey-Income from undisclosed source-Discrepancy in stocks-Excess stocks not properly verified by AO-Matter remanded for read judication. [S. 133A, 145(3)]

ACIT (IT) v. Vijaykumar Vasantbhai Patel (2023)101 ITR 1 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Loan received in USD and deposited in Indian bank account-Investment on same day in mutual funds-Source of funds outside India not taxable in India-CIT (A)’s direction to obtain certified true copies of source of income is justified-Order oof CIT(A) is affirmed.The CIT (A) directed the Assessing Officer to obtain from the assessee, the certified true copies of the above documents from the bank and furnish them before the Assessing Officer while giving effect to the appellate order. The CIT (A) further directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition after satisfying himself that the source of such investment was from outside India. The Tribunal held that there was no infirmity in the direction issued by the CIT (A). (AY. 2009-10).

Balusamy Manimekalai (Smt.) v. ACIT (2023) 103 ITR 10 (SN)(Chennai)(Trib)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Unexplained money-Search and seizure-Marriage Expenses of daughter-Source of funds for purchase of agricultural land-Gold Jewellery-Set off is given to cash in hand-Partly confirmed.[S.69A, 132]

Amar Singh Saharan v .ITO(2023)104 ITR 195 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S.68: Cash credits-Failure to cross-examine deponent of affidavits-Directed to delete the addition. [S. 254(1)]

Shailesh Popatbhai Katrodiya v. ITO (2023) 103 ITR 63 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Delay was condoned-Accountant inadvertently filed return declaring income u/s. 44AD and cash balance as at end of year-Onus upon department to disprove contention of assessee —No material brought on record to show cash generated by assessee from other activity subject to tax-Order bringing cash to tax as unexplained cash credit unsustainable.[S.44AD, 115BBE,253]