Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Genuine Finance P. Ltd. (2024) 464 ITR 588 /162 taxmann.com 700 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Genuine Finance P. Ltd. (2023) 294 Taxman 303 /(2024) 462 ITR 492 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Penny stock-Share trading-Information from investigation wing-VAS Insfracture Ltd (VASIL)-Not black listed by SEBI-Order of Tribunal allowing the loss is affirmed by High Court-Delay of 224 days-SLP of Revenue is dismissed on account of delay. [S. 10(38), 45, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Oriental Bank Of Commerce Ltd. (2024) 464 ITR 563 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Shares held as stock in trade-No disallowance can be made.[R. 8D]

CIT(E) v. Lata Mangeshkar Medical Foundation (2024) 464 ITR 702/162 taxmann.com 118 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, CIT (E) v. Lata Mangeshkar Medical Foundation (2024) 464 ITR 706 (SC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Information to charity commissioner-Remuneration to trustees-Denial of exemption is not justified. [S. 13(1)(c), 260A]

CIT(E) v. Lata Mangeshkar Medical Foundation (2024) 464 ITR 706/300 Taxman 178 (SC) Editorial : CIT(E) v. Lata Mangeshkar Medical Foundation (2024) 464 ITR 702 (Bom)(HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Information to charity commissioner-Remuneration to trustees-Denial of exemption is not justified-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 13(1)(c), 260A]

Assam Frontier Employees Pension Fund v. CIT (2024) 464 ITR 102/ 336 CTR 319/164 taxmann.com 116 (Cal)(HC)

S. 10(25) : Approved superannuation fund-Exemption-Only Chief Commissioner has power to withdraw approval-Approval not withdrawn-Denial of approval on ground that conditions for approval had not been complied with-Order of denial is not valid.[S. 10(25)(iii)]

T. V. Patel Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT ( 2023) 157 taxmann.com 108 / (2024) 464 ITR 409 / 336 CTR 136 (Bom)(HC) Tulsidas V. Patel (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT ( 2023) 157 taxmann.com 108 /(2024) 464 ITR 409/ 336 CTR 136 (Bom)(HC)

S. 5 : Scope of total income-Accrual of income-Terminating lease-Pendency of dispute before Small Causes Court-Small Causes Court allowing lessor to deposit lease rent in Court specifying that deposit was allowed without prejudice to rights of contestants-When the right to receive any sum by the assessee was in jeopardy and sub judice before the Small Causes Court, the Revenue was not justified in bringing to tax-Lease rent did not accrue to assessee. [S. 5(1)(b), 145 ]

High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of U.P. (2024) 299 Taxman 21 (SC)

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
S. 13: Criminal misconduct by a public servant-Power of High Court-Supreme Court-Automatic vacation of stay-Supreme Court cannot interfere with jurisdiction by passing blanket direction in exercise of power under article 142 and limiting High Court’s jurisdiction to pass interim orders valid only for six months at a time-Directions of Supreme Court that provided for automatic vacation of order of stay and disposal of all cases in which a stay had been granted on a day-to-day basis would virtually amount to judicial legislation and jurisdiction of Supreme Court cannot be exercised to make such a judicial legislation-Constitutional Courts, in ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for disposal of cases pending before any other Courts-A reasoned stay order once granted in any civil or criminal proceedings, if not specified to be time-bound, would remain in operation till decision of main matter or until and unless an application is moved for its vacation and a speaking order is passed adhering to principles of natural justice either extending, modifying, varying or vacating same. [ITAct, 1961, S. 254(2A), Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 141, 142, 226(3),227, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, 397, 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860,]

PT Bukaka Teknik Utama v. CIT (IT) (2024) 299 Taxman 156 /338 CTR 156 / 471 ITR 629 (Delhi)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

S. 2(1)(a) : Appellant-Amount payable and time of payment-Disputed tax-Filing of declaration and particulars to be furnished-Appeal dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals)-Time limit for filing an appeal before Income tax Appellate Tribunal is not expired-Eligible to apply under provisions of DTVSV-The revenue is directed to proceed with the application of the assessee in accordance with the provisions of the DTVSV Act and other applicable regulations. [S.2(1)(a)(ii), 2(1)(j)(B), 4, S. 250, 254(1), Art. 226]

Sree Metaliks Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 299 Taxman 227/(2025)472 ITR 141 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Delay of 394 days for depositing the TDS amount deducted-Deposited the TDS with interest-Delay was due to factors like market sluggishness, insolvency proceedings, and COVID-19 pandemic, with no mens rea involved-Proceeding is quashed. [S. 276B, 278B, 279(1)]

GE Capital US Holdings Inc. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024) 299 Taxman 108/ 468 ITR 746 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 270AA : Immunity from imposition of penalty, etc-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Application for immunity could not be rejected-Order rejecting the application is quashed-DTAA-India-USA [S.9(1)(vi),270A(9),270AA(3), art. 12, Art. 226]