Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT v. Young Scholar’s Educational Society (2024) 299 Taxman 145/341 CTR 52 /242 DTR 252/ 471 ITR 164 (P&H)(HC)/CIT v. Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Education Trust (2024) 341 CTR 52 /242 DTR 252 /299 Taxman 145 / 471 ITR 164 8 NYPCTR 889 (P&H)(HC)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Cancellation of registration-Commissioner had no jurisdiction to cancel registration certificate once granted by him to assessee under section 12A till 1-10-2004 [S. 12A, 260A]

Indian Merchants Chamber v. ACIT (2024) 299 Taxman 62 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 10(23C) : Charitable institution-Promoting, advancing and protecting trade, commerce and industry in India–Matter was remanded to Chief Commissioner for de novo consideration by applying law as laid down by Tribunal.Matter remanded. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iv), Art. 226]

CIT (E) v. India Trade Promotion Organization (2024) 299 Taxman 454/338 CTR 875 (SC) Editorial : CIT (E) v. India Trade Promotion Organisation (2023)454 ITR 799 / 294 taxman 1 (SC)

S. 10(23C) : Educational institution-Charitable purpose-Order of High Court affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed-Delay of 247b days-Review petition is dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iv), Art. 136]

CIT v. MOL Corporation (2024) 299 Taxman 506(SC) Editorial: CIT (IT)) v. MOL Corporation (2024) 162 taxmann.com 197 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees for technical services-Sale of software-Subscription fees-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed-DTAA-India-USA [S.9(1)(vii), art. 12, Art. 136]

Johnson Matthey Public Ltd. Comapany v. CIT(IT) (2024) 299 Taxman 334 /465 ITR 649 (Delhi)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of assessee is dismissed , Johnson Matthey Public Ltd. Co. v. CIT (IT) (2024) 469 ITR 31 (SC)

S. 9(1)(v) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Interest-Other income-Guarantee to various banks to extend credit facilities to its Indian subsidiaries-Guarantee charges were not received by assessee in respect of any debt owed to it by its Indian subsidiary-Guarantee fee would not fall within expression ‘interest’ in article 12 of India UK DTAA-Accrue-Arise-Income-DTAA-India-UK-Northern Ireland / [S. 2(28A), 5(2), 260A, art.7, 12(5), 23(3)]

CIT v. Mitsui & Co. Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 365(SC) Editorial : CIT (IT) v.Mitsui & Co. Ltd (2024) 161 taxmann.com 634 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Liaison Office-Non-Resident company-Did not finalize and transact a business deal and activities-Liaison Office could not be said to be preparatory or auxiliary in nature, LO did not constitute Permanent Establishment of assessee-MIPL was not performing additional function, in absence of material, it could not be taken as dependant agency PE to assessee, a non-resident company-Delay of 395 days-SLP of Revenue is dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits-DTAA-India-Japan [art. 5, Art. 136]

PCIT (Central) v. Pepsico India Holding (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 309 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Subsidy-Capital or revenue-Bengal Incentive Scheme, 2004-Linked to establishment of new units-Capital in nature.[S.28(i)]

PCIT v. INS Finance & Investment (P.) Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 131 / 340 CTR 602(Delhi)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest-Capital or revenue-Auction sale-Interest against principal amount deposited-Auction sale is nullified by court-Interest is capital receipt and cannot be assessed as income from other sources.[S. 56(2)(viii)]

Birla Corporation Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 299 Taxman 508 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Birla Corporation Ltd(2024) 159 taxmann.com 651 (Cal)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue Sales tax exemption-Notice is issued in SLP filed by the assesseee. [U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, S. 4A, Art. 136]

PCIT (Central) v. Dwarka Prasad Aggarwal (2024) 299 Taxman 363/471 ITR 435 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Dwarka Prasad Aggarwal (2022) 140 taxmann.com 32 / (2024) 471 ITR 432(Delhi)(HC)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Trade advances-Commercial transactions-Cannot be assessed as deemed dividend-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [Art. 136]