Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Excise Commissioner, Karnataka. v. Mysore Sales International Ltd(2024)466 ITR 205/ 300 Taxman 115/339 CTR 321 (SC) Editorial : Excise Commissioner, Karnataka. v. Mysore Sales International Ltd (2006) 286 ITR 136 (Karn)(HC), reversed.

S. 206C : Collection at source-Trading-Alcoholic liquor-Seller–Buyer-Marketing of arrack-Auction or Tender-Arrack then sold in retail by excise contractors in allotted area-Excise contractors obtained only right to vend arrack on retail-Not arrack-Not bound to collect tax from them-No express provision regarding issuance of notice and affording hearing to seller before passing an order-Requirement of notice and hearing before order passed to be read into provision-Natural justice-when order entails adverse civil consequences or is prejudicial to person concerned principles of natural justice to be followed.[S. 206C(6), Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, S. 17, 71, Karnataka Excise (Arrack Vend Special Conditions Of Licences) Rules, 1967, R. 2, 4, 5, Karnataka Excise (Manufacturing and Bottling of Arrack) Rules, 1987, Rr. 3, 17.]

PCIT v. Anuj Bansal (2024)466 ITR 251/165 taxmann.com 2 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Anuj Bansal (2024)466 ITR 254/165 taxmann.com 3 (SC)

S. 153D : Assessment-Search-Approval-Sanction must be accorded only after due consideration. [S.260A, 292B]

PCIT v. Anuj Bansal (2024)466 ITR 254/165 taxmann.com 3 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Anuj Bansal (2024) 466 ITR 251 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 153D : Assessment-Search-Approval-Approval is granted without application of mind-Assessment order is quashed-SLP dismissed. [S.292B, Art. 136]

Sunita Goel v. Dy. CIT (2024)466 ITR 404 /162 taxmann.com 740/(2025) 342 CTR 181 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Opportunity of hearing was granted-Order is valid-Writ petition is dismissed.[Art. 226]

Plasseri Pulikkal Muhammed Ali v. ACIT (2024)466 ITR 437/164 taxmann.com 1255 (Ker)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Issue raised in a writ petition was dismissed-Subsequent writ petition on same issue but with different grievance-Writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.[Art. 226]

Jatinder Singh Bhangu v. UOI (2024)466 ITR 474 / 300 Taxman 228/ 339 CTR 473(P&H)(HC) Jyoti Sareen v. UOI. (2024)466 ITR 474 / 300 Taxman 228/ 339 CTR 473(P&H)(HC)

S. 151A : Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment- Reassessment-Notice-Jurisdiction-Scheme-Procedure adopted by Department in contravention of statutorily prescribed procedure-Office Memorandum cannot override mandatory specifications in scheme-Reassessment notice is set aside-Department given liberty to proceed in accordance with amended provisions. [S. 144B, 147, 148, Art. 226]

Ramachandran Shivan v. ITO (2024)466 ITR 305/(2025) 343 CTR 214 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Amendment of Section 151 with effect from 1-4-2021-Issue of notice in respect Of Assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18 notice is not valid-Interpretation of taxing statutes-Proviso. [S. 147, 148,149(1), 151, Art. 226]

Manju Somani v. ITO (2024)466 ITR 758/165 taxmann.com 675 /300 Taxman 516 /340 CTR 946 / 242 DTR 241 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Bar Of Limitation-Initiation of proceedings from 1-4-2021-Notice issued beyond period of limitation of six years-Notice and order is quashed and set aside. [147, 148, 148A(d), 149, Art.226]

Ashok Kumar Makhija v. UOI (2024)466 ITR 283 /162 taxmann.com 514 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Sanction for notice issued by Income-Tax Authority which did not have jurisdiction-Notice is not Valid.[S. 147, 148, 151, Art.226]

Anup Kumar Agarwal v. UOI (2024)466 ITR 494 /300 Taxman 321 (Cal)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Time granted to respond to notice lesser than prescribed seven days-Opportunity of personal hearing not granted-Notices and order set aside. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b). 148A(d),151A Art. 226]