S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Winnings from lotteries or crossword puzzles-Online gaming-Winning amount paid to players of games available on its website-Revision is justified for for limited purpose of examining issue of deduction of TDS under section 194B.[S. 194B]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Urban agricultural land-Capital asset-Liable to be assessed as capital gains-Revision is affirmed. [S. 2(14), 45]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue–Exemption-Investment in residential house-Time limit-Date of transfer of shares-Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Investment made in land beyond period of two years-Revision is not justified-Entitle to exemption.[S. 45, 54F]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Dealer in gold-Loss through MCX transactions for hedging its stock-in-trade-Loss is business loss-Not speculative-Revision is not valid.[S. 28(i)) 43(5)(d), 143(3)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Income from other sources-Share premium-Discounted Cash flow (DCF) method-Selected for scrutiny on the ground that large share premium received during relevant assessment year-Assessing Officer accepted the claim-Commissioner was not justified in setting aside order of AO under section 263 on ground that AO had merely accepted claim of share premium without making enquiry with respect to valuation of shares. [S. 36(1)(va), 56(2)(viib),142(1), R.11UA]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Examined all details-Possible view-Revision is not valid.[S. 10(21)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Donation to political parties-No enquiry was made by the Assessing Officer-Revision is held to be justified.[S.80GGC]

S. 255 : Appellate Tribunal-Procedure-Functions-Jurisdiction-Transfer of appeals-Cash credits-Share capital and premium-Commissioner (Appeals), Kolkata deleted addition-Appeal filed by revenue before Gauhati Bench of Tribunal-Appeal is dismissed on ground of lack of jurisdiction. [S. 68, ITAT R, 1963, R. 4]

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Power to recall and to pass any order-Authority letter-Authority to counsel to appear and present before Tribunal-Authority is fullest, unlimited and unrestricted and there is no rider mentioned therein, withdrawal/non-pressing of ground by counsel-Tribunal had accepted withdrawal/non-pressing without authority of counsel is devoid of any merit and is rejected. [S. 254(1)]

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Non-speaking order-Procedure-Commissioner (Appeals) has to decide appeal on merit by passing a speaking order and does not have any power to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution.[S.68, 69, 131, 133(6), R.46A]