Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Wieden+Kennedy India Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 63 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-CIT(A) cannot go beyond the assessment year other than the one under consideration-Direction to AO to take remedial action for other Assessment year not sustainable.[S. 28(i), 253]

Neelkanth Developers v. Asst. DIT (2023) 101 ITR 44 (SN) (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 194IA : Deduction at source-Immoveable property-Assessee in business of real estate-Percentage Completion Method-Tax deducted by buyer at the time of execution of deed-Assessee to produce certificates to substantiate tax deducted on income offered in earlier or current year-AO to carry out necessary verification-Matter remanded to lower authority.[S. 145]

Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 5 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 192 : Deduction at source-Salary-Difference between sums reported in 26AS and sums reported by assessee-To be examined by AO.-Matter remanded. [Form No. 26AS]

Asst. CIT v. Dhar Construction Co. (2023)199 ITD 124 / 101 ITR 49 (SN)(Gauhati) (Trib)

S. 192 : Deduction at source-Salary to partners-Not liable to deduction of tax at source. [S. 15, Explanation 2, 40(a)(ia), 40(b)(v)]

Pujala Mahesh Babu v. Asst. CIT (2023)101 ITR 458 (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Warrant of authorization and panchanama clearly shows name of the assessee-Assessment proper. [S. 132]

Asst. CIT v. Paramount Probuild Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 101 ITR 36 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Cash Credits-No incriminating material found during search-Unabated assessment-Addition is not sustainable. [S.68]

Pawan Green Channels Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 101 ITR 19 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Sanction of CIT instead of A/JCIT-Notice bad in law. [S. 147, 148]

Pawan Green Channels Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 101 ITR 19 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment –Notice-Dissolution of Company-Company had been struck off from Register of Companies-Officially not intimidated to AO-Reassessment notice is valid.[S. 147]

Milind Madhukar Edke v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 88 (SN) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Income escaping assessment-No fresh material with AO to form opinion that income escaped assessment-Opinion based on incorrect basis-Proceeding on the basis of conjectures-Reassessment without jurisdiction. [S. 148]

Kamaldeep Singh v. ITO (2023) 101 ITR 302 (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Validity-Assessee, Power of Attorney holder and selling land for owner-No evidence indicating land belonged to assessee-Assessment made in the hands of assessee not justified.