S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Depreciation-Appeal settled under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-SLP became infructuous. [Art. 136]
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Depreciation-Appeal settled under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-SLP became infructuous. [Art. 136]
S. 270A : Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-
Immunity from imposition of penalty-Specific finding recorded in assessment order that assessee had under-reported income by misrepresenting facts in return of its income, application under section 270AA seeking immunity from imposition of penalty is not maintainable.[S.270A(9), 270AA, Art. 226]
S. 270A:Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Application filed by assessee under section 270AA seeking immunity from imposition of penalty had not been decided by Assessing Officer within prescribed time, impugned penalty order as well as demand notice issued under section 156 were to be set aside. [S.155(18), 156,270AA,Art. 226]
S. 268A : Appeal-Instructions-Monetary limits-Less than 10 lakhs-Applicable to pending appeals-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 119, 260A, Art.136 [
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-concessional rate of tax on dividend distributed to its foreign holding company-Not justified in rejecting revision application on ground that assessee could have filed a revised return or an appeal under section 248-DTAA-India-Mauritius-Matter remanded to decide on merit. [S. 9(1)(i), 90, 139(5), 195, 248, art. 10(2),Art.226]
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-concessional rate of tax on dividend distributed to its foreign holding company-Not justified in rejecting revision application on ground that assessee could have filed a revised return or an appeal under section 248-DTAA-India-Mauritius-Matter remanded to decide on merit. [S. 9(1)(i), 90, 139(5), 195, 248, art. 10(2),Art.226]
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Fringe benefit tax-Included in the return as abundant caution-CIT(A) held that the amount included in the return is not chargeable to tax-Revision application is filed after 5-6 years-Application for condonation of application is rejected-Allowing the petition the Court held that since it took a long time for Commissioner (Appeals) to dispose assessee’s appeal, Commissioner should have condoned delay and decided matter on merits.[S. 115WB, 143(1), 250, Art. 226]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order and on merit affirmed by High Court. [80IA(4)(ii), 260A]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Shares at premium-Confirmation was filed-Assessing Officer passed the order after verification-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision is affirmed. [S. 56(2) (viib), 143(3), 260A]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Depreciable assets-Block of assets-Claim of set off of brought forward long term capital loss against short term capital gain under section 50-Plausible view-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 2(11), 32,72,143(3), 260A]