Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Vijay Gautam v. Asst. CIT (2023) 222 TTJ 191 / 151 Taxmann. com 485 (All)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Undisclosed professional receipts-40% of expenses are allowed on estimate basis-Interest income from bank addition is justified. [S. 28(i), 37(1)]

Dy. CIT v. Hi-Tech Engineers (2023) 222 TTJ 785 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Income from undisclosed sources-Assessment-Bogus purchases-Order of CIT(A) restricting disallowance of purchases to 5 per cent of alleged bogus purchases is affirmed. [S. 143(3)]

Dhanpat Raj Khatri v. ITO (2023) 222 TTJ 382 / 154 Taxmann. com 58 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Sale of ancestral gold and savings-Addition is deleted-Reassessment notice is not justified. [S. 147, 148]

Vaishnavi Bullion (P.) Ltd. v ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 909 / 145 Taxmann. com 197 (Hyd)(Trib) Musaddila Gems & Jewels P. Ltd v ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 909 / 145 Taxmann. com 197 (Hyd)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Search and survey-Demonetization-Cash deposits-Negligible stock-in-trade-Annonymous buyers-Addition is affirmed. [S. 131, 292C, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S. 26, 31, 34, 92]

Alwar General Finance Co (P) Ltd v. ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 665 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Creditworthiness and genuineness of transaction is established-Addition is deleted.

Dy. CIT v. Hi-Tech Engineers (2023) 222 TTJ 785 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-All parties appeared in response to summons and submitted income tax return and bank statements-Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition is affirmed.

Farsha S. Kadri v ITO (2024) 222 TTJ 31 (SMC)(Surat)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Explanation of source of deposit is accepted partially and remaining addition is affirmed.

Kamal Binani v. ITO(2023) 222 TTJ 17 (UO) (SMC) (Mum)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Payment of insurance premium-Payment though bank-Addition is deleted.

Dy. CIT v. Mahavir Ashok Enterprises (P) Ltd (2023) 223 TTJ 947 (Raipur)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application-Furnished names, address PAN, copies of bank account etc of investor companies-Addition is deleted.

Gopal Nihchaldas Pariani v. ITO (2023) 223 TTJ 361 / 152 taxmann. com 252 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Sale of shares-Penny stock-Long term capital gains-Report of investigation wing from Kolkata-Pine Animation Ltd-Purchase of shares, payment for purchase of shares through banking channel–Genuineness of transaction is proved-Cannot be assessed as cash credits-Entitle to exemption. [S. 38, 45]