Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Vivek Saran Agarwal v. UOI (2024) 296 Taxman 281 (All.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained investments-Act does not contemplate any detailed adjudication on merits of information available with Assessing Officer at stage of passing order under section 148A(d)-Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 69, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

E.Construct FZ LLC v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 440 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice-A notice under section 148A(b), dated 30-3-2023, was served upon assessee to file a response by 10-4-2023-Assessee sent a communication dated 14-4-2023 explaining difficulty in filing response by 10-4-2023 as same was served on 14-4-2023-Order passed without considering the reply-Order and notice is set aside.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Thorapadi Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 296 Taxman 250 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Co-operative societies-Interest received from Co-Operative banks-Entitle to exemption.[S.2(19), 80P(2) (a)(i), 80P(2)(d), 148A(b), 148A(d), Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act, 1983,, Co-Operative Societies Act, 1912, Art. 226]

Srivenkateshwar Tradex (P.) Ltd. v. P CIT (2024) 296 Taxman 76 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Principle of natural justice-Only two days to file the reply-Order passed is set aside. [S.69C, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Tirupati Trading Corporation v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 535 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Bogus entry-No transaction is carried out-Order disposing objection and notice is quashed.[S.68, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Chotanagpur Diocesson Trust Asson. v. UOI (2024) 296 Taxman 16 /464 ITR 748 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order passed without providing information gathered from investigation wing-Order and subsequent notice is quashed and set aside.[S. 2((15),12A, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

Swiss Re Services India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 296 Taxman 190 / 470 ITR 221 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Annual subscription fee to club-Capital or revenue-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 37(1), 143(1), 148, Art. 226]

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 296 Taxman 117 / 338 CTR 220(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Professional fees-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 40(a)(i), 148, Art. 226]

Koa Investment Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 296 Taxman 311 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained money-Loans and advances-Investment in Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs)-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 69A, 148, Art. 226]

Bharatkumar Dinubhai Patel v. ITO (2024) 296 Taxman 128 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained investments-Development agreement-Specific query in the course of assessment proceedings-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.69A, 148, Art. 226]