Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Network Programme India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 335/(2024)461 ITR 37 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital work-in-progress-Change of opinion-Audit objection-No fresh tangible material-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S.143(3) 148 260A]

Amneal Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 197 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Special economic zones-Explanation was furnished in the course of assessment proceedings-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.10AA, 148, Art. 226]

Ankur V. Bankda v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 430 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Unexplained investments-Failure to provide alleged SEBI Investigation report-Syncom Formulations Limited-Long term gains-Assessment order is set aside-Remanded back to Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) with a direction to make available to assessee a copy of report of SEBI relied upon in reasons to believe for re-opening of assessment. [S. 10(38) 69, 144B, 148, Art. 226]

Vaman Prestressing Co. (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 252/(2024) 461 ITR 192 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Interest on borrowed capital-Advance of amount to sister concern and associate concerns without charging interests-Commercial expediency-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 36(1)(iii), 148, Art. 226]

Sterlite Technologies Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 459 ITR 83 / 295 Taxman 488 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Depreciation-Goodwill-Query raised and reply was filed-Issue was considered in the course of assessment proceedings-Audit-Even if it is an error that the Assessing Officer discovered, still the error discovered on a reconsideration of the same material does not give him power to reopen the assessment-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32, 148, Art. 226]

Manujendra Shah v. CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 374 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Capital gains were calculated by assessee by taking circle-rate-Provisions of section 50C is not applicable-No reason between material and revenue’s belief on income escapement-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 45, 50C,54EC 148, Art. 226]

Kunal Kiran Sheth v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 292 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Slump sale-Borrowed satisfaction-Difference in valuation-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 45, 54EC, 148, 154, Art. 226]

CIT v. Canara Bank (2023) 155 taxmann.com 289/ 456 ITR 316 (Karn)(HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue is dismissed, CIT v. Canara Bank (2023) 295 Taxman 228/(2024) 460 ITR 6 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts-Schedule bank-No failure to disclose material facts-Order of the Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 36(1)(viia), 148, 260A]

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 627 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Additional report-Reassessment notice based on audit report which is already on the record-No new fresh tangible material-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32(i)(iia), 148, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Seastem Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 671 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Block of assets-Profit on sales of barge-No failure to disclose material facts-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 2(11), 32]