Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy v. PCIT (2024) 296 Taxman 502/ 460 ITR 615 / 336 CTR 108(Mad.)(HC)

S. 90 : Double taxation relief-Foreign tax credit (FTC)-Form-67 filed before completion of assessment and after due date specified for furnishing return under section. 139(1)-Rejection of FTC is not justified-DTAA-India-Australia [S. 91, 139(1), 143(1), Rule 128, Form-67 Art. 24, Art. 226]

Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. (P.) Ltd. v. PDGIT (2024) 296 Taxman 576 (SC) Editorial : Refer, PDGIT v. Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. (P.) Ltd [2023] 153 taxmann.com 416 / [2023] 240 COMP CASE 282 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Sale of shares gifted by promoters-BIFR cannot sanction any modification to scheme directing the Income tax department to give further tax concession without department being consenting to grant additional concession-SLP is granted against the order of High Court. [S. 45, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, 3(1)(o), 17, 18, 22A, Art. 136]

CIT v. Vantage International Management Co. (2024) 296 Taxman 160 (SC) Editorial : Refer, CIT (IT) v. B.J. Services Co.Me Ltd (2022) 145 taxmann.com 430/ (2023) 457 ITR 80 (Uttarkhand)(HC)

S. 44BB : Mineral oils-Computation-Presumptive tax — Non-resident-Service tax collected-Not includible in gross receipt-SLP of Revenue is dismissed [S.44BB(2)]

Asian Hotels Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 296 Taxman 69 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Hotel-renovation, refurbishment and repairs-Consultancy payments-Allowable as revenue expenditure.[S.28((i)]

IFGL Refractories Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 296 Taxman 553 /463 ITR 649 / 338 CTR 73 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 10AA : Special Economic Zones-Constitutional validity-Explanation after sub-section (1) of section 10AA, inserted by amendment with prospective effect from 1-4-2018, applicable in respect of assessment year 2018-19 and subsequent years-Constitutionally valid. [Art. 14, 19(1)(g), 226 265]

CIT (IT) v. ZTE Corporation (2024) 296 Taxman 571 (SC) Editorial : Refer, CIT (IT) v. ZTE Corporation (2021) 282 Taxman 304 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Sale of telecom equipment’s. i.e. mobile handsets-Supply of articles or goods-Not taxable as royalty-Review petition against SLP is dismissed-DTAA-India-China. [S. 9(1)(i), Art, 12]

CIT (IT) v. Augustus Capital Pte. Ltd. (2024) 296 Taxman 398 /463 ITR 199(Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Capital gains-Shares-Not liable to be assessed as capital gains-Explanations 6 and 7 to section 9(1)(i) has to be treated retrospectively as it have to be read along with Explanation 5 which operates from 1-4-1962-OECD Model Convention, Art. 13 [S. 260A]

Chaitanya Memorial Educational Society v. CIT (E)(2023) 335 CTR 868/ (2024) 296 Taxman 297/ 469 ITR 571 (Telangana )(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery – Assessee deemed in default – Stay – Pendency of rectification application- Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)- Stay is granted on entire demand till disposal of appeal . [ S.2(15), 12A, 154 , 220(6), 250 , Art. 226 ]

PDGIT v. Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. (P.) Ltd [2023] 153 taxmann.com 416 / [2023] 240 COMP CASE 282 ( Delhi )( HC) Editorial : SLP is granted against the order of High Court , Indian Plywood Mfg. Co. (P.) Ltd. v. PDGIT (2024) 296 Taxman 576 (SC)

S. 48 : Capital gains –Mode of Computation – Sale of shares gifted by promoters – BIFR cannot sanction any modification to scheme directing the Income tax department to give further tax concession without department being consenting to grant additional concession .[ S. 45 , Sick Industrial Companies ( Special Provisions ) Act , 1985 , 3(1)(o) , 17 , 18 , 22A, Art. 226 ]

Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd v. NFAC ( 2023) 157 taaxmann.com 442 ( Bom)( HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, NFAC v. Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. (2024) 296 Taxman 575 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Redemption of preference shares – Provisions of section 47(iv) are not applicable to redemption of preference shares- Order of Assessing Officer allowing the loss is affirmed – Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed . [ S. 2(47) 47 , 47 ( iv),47(v) , 148 , Art. 226 ]