Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Angelica Properties P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)105 ITR 442 (Pune) (Trib) Vason Engineers Ltd v. Add. CIT (2023)105 ITR 442 (Pune) (Trib)

S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Interest expenses-Not maintaining separate books for investments-Disallowance by the Assessing Officer is affirmed. [R.6D]

Dy. CIT (E) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (2023)105 ITR 24 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Income applied to charitable purposes more than receipts of year-Excess applied can be carried forward to succeeding year-Plant and machinery-Depreciation is allowed.[S. 32]

Harman Connected Services Corporation India P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)105 ITR 36 (SN)/ 151 taxmann.com 500 (Bang) (Trib)

S. 10AA : Special Economic Zones-Turnover-Expenses incurred in foreign currency for providing technical services outside India-Not to be excluded from export turnover.

Avaya International Sales Ltd. v.Asst. CIT (2023)105 ITR 48 (SN)/ 153 taxmann.com 536 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Non-Resident-Fees for technical services-Rendering services-Matter remanded-DTAA-India-Ireland.[art. 12]

Dy. CIT v. Software One Pte. Ltd. (2023) 105 ITR 605 / 155 taxmann.com 133 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Distributor of software-Not sale of copyright-Income from sale of software in India is not royalty-DTAA-India-Singapore [Art.12(3)]

Purshottam Farmers Co. Op Cotton Ginning & Pressing Society Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 203 ITD 698 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Disallowance of claim-Mere filing incorrect claim which was not allowed by Assessing Officer would not attract concealment penalty.

Anil Manhare. v. ITO (2023) 203 ITD 298 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S.271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Cash loan from relative-Investment in properties-Levy of penalty is deleted. [S. 269SS]

D.V. Properties (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 203 ITD 283 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-short-term capital gain on Multiplex sold-Capital gains-Block of assets-Depreciable assets-Service tax-Delay in payment of TDS-Revision order is quashed partly-Employees’ contributions (EPF/ESI)-Revision is affirmed. [S. 36(1)(va), 37(1), 43B , 50, 143(3)]

Chomansingh M. Deora. v. PCIT (2023) 203 ITD 240 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Interest expenditure-Nexus of interest expenditure with interest income-Revision order is affirmed.[S. 57]

Madhu Devi Jain. (Smt.) v. ITO (2023) 203 ITD 713 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Sale of seven flats within three years of acquisition-Revision is held to be justified. [S. 54F , 143(3)]