Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Shree Nilkanth Developers v. PCIT (2023) 457 ITR 464 /294 Taxman 591 / 334 CTR 1 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. Shree Nilkanth Developers(2016) 73 taxmann.com 76 (Guj)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Application-Additional income disclosed-Settlement Commission accepted the additional income-High Court set aside the order-On appeal the matter was remanded back to Settlement Commission (now Interim Board) for reconsideration and re-determination of undisclosed income, after giving an opportunity to both sides. [S. 133A, 2245C, 245D(4), Art. 136]

Bishan Das Goyal HUF v. PCIT (2023) 294 Taxman 102 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Pendency of proceedings-No proceedings was pending-Petition is not maintainable.[S. 147 148, 245A, Art. 226]

Maa Mahamaya Industries Ltd. v. ITSC (2023) 459 ITR 277 / 153 taxmann.com 295 (Telegana) (HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee is dismissed, Maa Mahamaya Industries Ltd. v. ITSC (2023) 459 ITR 301 / 294 Taxman 424 (SC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Failure to disclose full and true disclosure-Writ petition is dismissed-SLP is dismissed. [S. 245D(1), Art.226]

Maa Mahamaya Industries Ltd. v. ITSC (2023) 459 ITR 301 / 294 Taxman 424 (SC) Editorial : Maa Mahamaya Industries Ltd. v. ITSC (2023) 459 ITR 277 / 153 taxmann.com 295 (Telegana) (HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Failure to disclose full and true disclosure-Writ petition is dismissed-SLP is dismissed. [S. 245D(1), Art. 136]

Mansarovar Commercial (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2023) 294 Taxman 513 / 335 CTR 744 (SC) Editorial : Mansarovar Commercial (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2023) 453 ITR 661/ 293 Taxman 312//332 CTR 137 /224 DTR 305 (SC).

S. 234A : Interest-Default in furnishing return of income-Levy of interest is mandatory-Review petition is dismissed. [S. 2(35), 5, 6(3)(ii), 131, 142(1), 143(2), 148,, 282]

Rangasamy Engineers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 294 Taxman 610 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Trading in waste materials-Return not filed by the seller-Sellers stock register-The assessee was not liable to submit any evidence to prove seller’s return and other particulars of seller-Demand is stayed. [Art. 226]

Nirmal Kumar Pradeep Kumar, (HUF) v. UOI (2023) 456 ITR 386/ 294 Taxman 321 / 333 CTR 345(Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-Pendency of appeal-Discretionary powers is to be exercised judiciously and reasonably and not arbitrary-Order quashed-Directed to pass fresh order in accordance with law.[S. 220(6), 250, Art. 226]

Kunj Bihari Lal Agarwal v. PCIT(C) (2023) 294 Taxman 273/ 335 CTR 226 (Raj)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Financial hardship-Directed the authority to issue a fresh order after thoroughly considering the facts, circumstances, and submissions made by the Assessee. [S. 250 Art.226]

Legend Steel (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2023) 294 Taxman 564 (Orissa) (HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Cash credits-Pendency of stay application-Assessing Officer was directed to consider the stay application and pass an order. [S. 68, 220(6), 250, Art. 226]

CIT (IT) v. Air India Ltd (2023)294 Taxman 163 /456 ITR 139(SC) Editorial : CIT v. Air India Ltd. (2022) 289 Taxman 492/ (2023) 456 ITR 117 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 206AA : Requirement to furnish Permanent Account Number-Non-Resident-Provision cannot have overriding effect on DTAA-Rates prescribed under DTAA are applicable-DTAA-India-Netherland-SLP of Revenue dismissed. [S. 2(37A)(iii), 4, 5, 9(1)(i), 90(2), 206AA(7), Art. 12(4)]