Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Aruna Tiwari (Smt.) v.PCIT (2023)108 ITR 40/226 TTJ 510 (Raipur) (Trib)

AEP Investments (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2023)108 ITR 37 (Delhi)(Trib)

AEP Investments (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2023)108 ITR 37 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 254(2A): Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Non-Resident having no assets in India-Directed to furnish a bank guarantee covering 20 Per Cent-Recovery of outstanding demand shall remain stayed for a period of 180 days from date of this order or till disposal of appeal, whichever ever is earlier. [S. 226]

Dy. CIT v. Vintage Enterprises (2023)108 ITR 10 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Memorandum of appeal-Two assessment orders-Contends are different-Matter remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) to verify and adjudicate de novo complying with principles of natural justice-Principal Chief Commissioner is directed to make a thorough enquiry.[S. 143(3), 250]

Dy. CIT v.Anil Kumar Jain (2023)108 ITR 41 (SN)(Chd) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Monetary limits for appeals by Department —Deduction only on actual payment-Employee’s contribution to employees’ State Insurance-Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 43B, 143(1)]

Alpha Reality v. Asst. CIT (2023)108 ITR 7 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-No power to introduce new source of income-Commissioner (Appeals) must confine himself to items of income which were subject matter of original assessment. [S. 143(3)]

Nitin Amratlal Brahmbhatt v. ACIT (2023)108 ITR 18 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Ex-Parte order —Matter remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) with direction to assessee to remain present and make submissions. [S. 254(1)]

Basant Sekhani v. ITO (2023)108 ITR 14 (SN)(Surat) (Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Delay of 350 days-Delay in filing the appeal is condoned-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer to decide on merits.[S.144, 271(1)(c)]

AMI Deepak Shah v. NFAC (2023)108 ITR 42 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Ex Parte order-Notices issued to E-Mail address mentioned in appeal memo —Dismissal is held to be not valid-Appeals restored to Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits.[S.80IC, 250(2)]

Nike India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)108 ITR 666 (Bang) (Trib)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Not granting interest despite directions of Dispute Resolution Panel-Assessing Officer is directed to follow the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel and grant interest in accordance with law.

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. v.Add. CIT (2023)108 ITR 329 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax-applies on returned income and not on assessed income. [S. 234C]