S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Inability to participate in video conference-Natural justice-No fault of the assessee-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to pass a speaking order after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. [S. 143(3), 144, Art. 226]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Cash credits-Un secured loan-No opportunity of cross examination is provided-Assessment order is set aside. [S. 68, 133(6) Art, 226]

S. 143(3): Assessment-Notice is sent to wrong email-Order is set a side-The Assessing Officer is directed to pass an order after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. [S. 156, Art. 226]

S. 143(3): Assessment-Capital gains-Penny stock-Shyam transactions-Statement of third parties used against the assessee-No opportunity of cross examination is given-Assessment order is set aside and matter remanded for reconsideration.[S. 10(38) 45, 112A, Art. 226]

S. 143(3): Assessment-r Principle of natural justice-Order passed without giving an opportunity of hearing is set aside.[S. 142(1), Art.226]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Corporate insolvency resolution plan was approved by National Company Law Tribunal on 14-10-2022 which provided that no person shall be entitled to initiate any proceedings against assessee in relation to claims so long such result to a period prior to effective date of resolution plan, i.e., 10-11-2022-Notice issued under section 143(2) to assessee for A.Y. 2022-23 is bad in law and quashed. [S. 142, 143(2), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S. 14, Art. 226]]

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Fees for technical services-Insertion of explanation to Section 9 By Finance Act, 2010 with effect from 1-6-1976-No disallowance can be made-Interpretation-General principles-Principles of lex non cogit ad impossibilla, and impotentia excust legem.[S.9(1)(vii), 195, 260A

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Construction of school and temples situated in the villages sur-rounding the mining area-business exigencies-Allowable as revenue expenditure-No substantial question of law. [S. 260A]

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Iron ore mining was illegal-Transport charges-allowable as revenue expenditure-Allegation that part of expenditure utilised by director-No disallowance can be made in the assessment of company-No substantial question of law. [S. 37(1), Explanation, 260A]

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for warranty-Under contract of sale-Liquidated damages-Allowable as expenditure-Leave travel allowance as per rule and consistency practice-Allowable deduction-Provision of 43B(f) is not applicable. [S.10(15), 43B(f), 260A,]