Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Pawa Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. (2023) 457 ITR 392/291 Taxman 297 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital asset-Lease hold right-Capital or revenue-Cancellation of allotment of plot of land-Compensation-Treated as capital-receipt Revision order was quashed. [S. 2(14), 4, 28(i)]

PCIT v. Reeta Lakhmani (2023) 291 Taxman 358 (Cal)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Initiation of proceedings based on a proposal given by the assessing officer-Without application of mind-Revision was quashed. [S. 10(38) 45]

Embassy Brindavan Developers v. CIT (2023) 457 ITR 234/ 291 Taxman 188 (Karn)(HC).Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed by the Revenue , CIT v. Embassy Brindavan Developers (2023) 294 Taxman 437 (SC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Purchase and sale of land-Capital asset-Intention to construct a Tech Park-No development activity-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 2(14),28(i), 45, 143(3)]

PCIT v. Sanjay Dhingra (2023)457 ITR 588/ 291 Taxman 291 (Cal)(HC)/PCIT v. Sidhant Gupta ( 2023) 457 ITR 588/ 291 Taxman 291 (Cal)( HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Failure of Tribunal examine the matter on merits-Matter remanded. [S. 260A, 271 A ABB, 273B]

ITSC v. Agson Global (P.) Ltd. (2023) 291 Taxman 356 (SC) Editorial: Agson Global (P.) Ltd v. ITSC (2016) 380 ITR 342/ 237 Taxman 158 (Delhi)(HC), affirmed.

S. 245F : Settlement Commission-Powers-Special Audit-Settlement Commission does not have power to direct aa special audit under section 142(2A) of the Act. [S. 142(2A), 245C, Art. 136]

Dabur India Ltd. v. CIT (TDS) (2023) 291 Taxman 3 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 225 : Collection and recovery-Stay of proceedings-20 percent not a pre-requisite for all appeals-Prima facie case, the balance of convenience, and irreparable injury while disposing of the stay application-stay order is set aside, and the matter is remanded for fresh adjudication after granting an opportunity to be heard. [S. 220, Art. 226]

Noorul Islam Educational Trust v. CIT (Appeals) (2023) 291 Taxman 271 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)-Refund-Assessee was directed to approach appropriate authority under section 220(6) by filing stay application pending appeal. [S. 220(6), 225,246A, Art. 226]

Tungabhadra Minerals (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 291 Taxman 250 / 455 ITR 311/ 331 CTR 73/ 222 DTR 353 (Bom.)(HC) Salgaocar Mining Industries (P) Ltd v Dy. CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 250 / 455 ITR 311/ 331 CTR 73/ 222 DTR 353 (Bom.)(HC) Salitho ores (P) Ltd v Dy. CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 250 / 455 ITR 311/ 331 CTR 73/ 222 DTR 353 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Financial hardship-Rejection of application without reasoning-Remanded back to Principal Commissioner to reconsider issue and pass an appropriate order after granting an opportunity of hearing to assessee. [S. 132, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd. (2023) 291 Taxman 229 (Bom)(HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed PCIT v. Vedanta Ltd (2023)291 Taxman 205 / 146 taxman.com 34 (SC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Commission earned by non-resident agent carrying on business of selling Indian goods outside India could not be said to be income which had accrued and/or arisen in India and, thus, assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on payment of such commission to foreign agents.[S. 40(a)(i)]

CIT (TDS) v. Vodafone Cellular Ltd (2023) 291 Taxman 447 (SC) Editorial: CIT (TDS) v. Vodafone Cellular Ltd (2021) 131 tamann.com 191 (Bom)(HC)

S. 194H : Deduction at source-Commission or brokerage-Discounts given by assessee-telecommunication Company on the sale of prepaid SIM cards to distributors-SLP admitted.