Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT v. Abacus Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 453 ITR 224 (SC) Editorial: Abacus Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 284 Taxman 654 (Bom.)(HC), decision of the Bombay High Court is modified and matter remanded.

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment –Failure to issue show cause notice and draft assessment order —Order of High Court is not erroneous -Judgment modified and matter remanded to Assessing Officer to pass fresh assessment order. [144B(1) (xvib), Art. 132, 226]

Add. CIT v. Parull Isharani (2023) 453 ITR 221 (SC) Editorial: Parull Isharani v. Add.CIT (Bom)(HC), (W.P. (L) No. 13138 of 2021 dt 13 -9 -2021), Department was allowed to file the Review petition before High Court.

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Failure to serve draft assessment order -Department was allowed to file Review Petition before High Court to consider effect of omission of Section 144B(9) with effect from 1-4-2021. [S. 144B(9), Art. 136, Art. 226]

Add. CIT v. Multiplier Brand Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 453 ITR 233/ 332 CTR 211 (SC) Editorial : Multiplier Brand Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 442 ITR 202 (Bom)(HC), order of High Court is modified and matter remanded to the Assessing Officer.

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment –Failure to issue notice and draft assessment order – Judgment modified and matter remanded to Assessing Officer. [144B(1) (xvib), Art,136, 226]

Hillwood Furniture Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023) 453 ITR 749 (SC) Editorial : Hillwood Furniture Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023) 21 ITR-OL 634 (Ker)(HC)

S. 133A : Power of survey -Residential premises -Held to be valid -SLP of assessee is dismissed. [S. 260A, Art. 136]

Yogeshbhai Chandrakant Pala v. ITO (2023)453 ITR 263 / 292 Taxman 370 (Guj)(HC)

S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets -Failure to deal with application for release of seized articles -Direction by High Court to consider application. [S. 132, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Sanjay Chhabra (2023)453 ITR 516 (Raj)(HC)

S. 132(4) : Search and seizure – Statement on oath-Undisclosed investment-Retraction of statement-Opportunity of cross-examination was not given – Merely on the basis of statement addition is not justified. [S. 69, 132, 260A]

Kamal Nath v. PCIT (NO. 2) (2023)453 ITR 588/ 291 Taxman 532/ 330 CTR 345/ 221 DTR 313 (Cal)(HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -Kolkata to Delhi – Opportunity of hearing was given – Transfer for purposes of Co-Ordinated and detailed Investigation -Order of transfer was valid. [S. 127 (2), 132, 133A, Art. 226]

Kamal Nath v. PCIT (NO. 1) (2023)453 ITR 583 (Cal) (HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -Kolkata to Delhi -Natural justice – Failure to give an opportunity -Order was set aside.[S. 127(2), 132, 133A, Art, 226]

Kamal Nath v. PCIT (No. 3) (2023)453 ITR 604 / 292 Taxman 295/ 331 CTR 306/ 223 DTR 73 (Cal)(HC) Editorial : Decision of the Single Judge is affirmed, Kamal Nath v. PCIT (NO. 2) (2023)453 ITR 588/ 291 Taxman 532/ 330 CTR 345/ 221 DTR 313 (Cal)(HC).SLP of assessee is dismissed, Kamal Nath v. PCIT (2023)453 ITR 748/ 292 Taxman 240 (SC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -Kolkata to Delhi – Search and seizure -Survey – Opportunity of hearing was given – Transfer for purposes of Co-Ordinated and detailed Investigation -Order of transfer was valid- The assessee has no right to be assessed under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in a particular area or locality- An order of transfer is purely in the nature of an administrative order passed for consideration of convenience of the Department and no possible prejudice can be involved when the cases have been transferred [S. 127 (2), 132, 133A Art.226]

Kamal Nath v. PCIT (2023) 453 ITR 748 / 292 Taxman 240 (SC) Editorial: Kamal Nath v. PCIT (No. 3) (2023) 453 ITR 604 / 292 Taxman 295/ 331 CTR 306/ 223 DTR 73 (Cal)(HC) is affirmed.

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases -SLP dismissed – Observations of High Court to have no reflection on merits.[S. 127(2), 132, 133A Art. 136, 226]