Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Knight Riders Sports Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)459 ITR 16/ 295 Taxman 537 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Payment to non-Resident-Mangement and consultancy fees-Change of opinion-Query raised in the course of assessment proceedings-No power to review the order-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 40(a)(i), 147, 148A(b).148A(d), 195, Art. 226]

Anokhi Realty (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 457 ITR 695/ 295 Taxman 60 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Succession to business-Notice in the name of non-existing entity-Assessing Officer was informed-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 147, 170, Art. 226]

Utpala Pradeep Jain v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 322 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice on dead person-Order is quashed and set aside.[S. 147, 159, 292B, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Network Programme India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 335 / (2024) 461 ITR 37(Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital work-in-progress-Change of opinion-Audit objection-No fresh tangible material-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S.143(3) 148 260A]

PCIT v. Network Programme India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 335/(2024)461 ITR 37 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital work-in-progress-Change of opinion-Audit objection-No fresh tangible material-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S.143(3) 148 260A]

Amneal Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 197 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Special economic zones-Explanation was furnished in the course of assessment proceedings-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.10AA, 148, Art. 226]

Ankur V. Bankda v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 430 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Unexplained investments-Failure to provide alleged SEBI Investigation report-Syncom Formulations Limited-Long term gains-Assessment order is set aside-Remanded back to Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) with a direction to make available to assessee a copy of report of SEBI relied upon in reasons to believe for re-opening of assessment. [S. 10(38) 69, 144B, 148, Art. 226]

Vaman Prestressing Co. (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 252/(2024) 461 ITR 192 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Interest on borrowed capital-Advance of amount to sister concern and associate concerns without charging interests-Commercial expediency-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 36(1)(iii), 148, Art. 226]

Sterlite Technologies Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 459 ITR 83 / 295 Taxman 488 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Depreciation-Goodwill-Query raised and reply was filed-Issue was considered in the course of assessment proceedings-Audit-Even if it is an error that the Assessing Officer discovered, still the error discovered on a reconsideration of the same material does not give him power to reopen the assessment-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32, 148, Art. 226]

Manujendra Shah v. CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 374 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Capital gains were calculated by assessee by taking circle-rate-Provisions of section 50C is not applicable-No reason between material and revenue’s belief on income escapement-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 45, 50C,54EC 148, Art. 226]