Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Serum Institute of India (P.) Ltd. v UOI [2024] 463 ITR 582 /336 CTR 6 (Bom)(HC)

S. 2(24)(xviii) : Income-Assistance in the form of a subsidy or grant or cash incentive or duty drawback or waiver or concession or reimbursement-Incentive-Subsidies-Capital or revenue-Constitutional validity of insertion of sub-clause (xviii) of the Finance Act, 2015 which brought subsidies, all forms of incentives given by Government under the ambit of taxable income-The Amendment was constitutionally valid-The mere fact that the institution of tax by virtue of the impugned sub-clause falls more heavily on petitioner cannot result in its invalidity-Court Cannot Substitute Legislative Judgment of Economic Policies. [S. 4, Art. 12, 14, 19, 226, 246, 265, 289]

S.S. Hyderabad Biriyanai (P.) Ltd v. Dy. DIT (Inv) (2024) 298 Taxman 198/ 160 taxmann.com 418/465 ITR 410 (SC) Editoorial : S.S. Hyderabad Biriyanai (P.) Ltd v. Dy. DIT (Inv) (2024) 160 taxmann.com 417 (Mad)(HC)

S. 277 : Offences and prosecutions-False statement-Verification-Prosecution was launched two years prior to date of filing of application before Settlement Commission-Pending of prosecution was not brought to the notice of Settlement Commission-Provision of section 245I is not applicable-Proceedings canot be quashed-SLP of assessee is dismissed.[S. 245C, 245I, Art. 136]

Hansa Metallics Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 298 Taxman 67 (P&H)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Willful attempt to evade tax-Paid self assessment tax with interest-Delayed payment of income tax would not amount to evasion of tax, there was no evasion of tax on part of assessee-company though there was a delay in payment of tax for which interest was paid-Prosecution launched is quashed. [S.140A(3), 276(2), 278B, Art. 226]

Sengoda Gounder Educational and Charitable Trust v. ITO (2024) 298 Taxman 776/(2025) 478 ITR 354 (Mad.)(HC)/Editirial :SLP of revenue dismissed , ITO v. Sengoda Gounder Educational & Charitable Trust . [2025] 478 ITR 356 / 176 taxmann.com 476 (SC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Reasonable cause-Concerned staff was on leave-Proceedings are quashed. [S. 201(1)278AA, Art. 226]

Varun Sood v. ACIT (2024) 298 Taxman 292 / 471 ITR 298(Delhi)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Principal officer-Merely because a person holds an office in a corporate entity, it would not be sufficient to place that individual in clause (b) of section 2(35); he must be connected with management and administration of company Matter remanded. [[S. 2(35)(b), Art. 226]

Jt. CIT v. Clix Capital Services (P.) Ltd. (2024) 298 Taxman 90 / 464 ITR 768 (SC) Editoorial : Clix Capital Services (P.) Ltd v.JCIT (2023) 149 taxmann.com 279/ 459 ITR 470 / 334 CTR 574/ 225 DTR 232 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation-Natural justice-Delay of ten years in issuing show cause notice-Notice issued in November 2017-Barred by limitation-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 271, 274, 275(1)(c)]

Raj Educational Trust v. Dy. CIT(E) (2024) 298 Taxman 369 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 271DA : Penalty for failure to comply with provisions of section 269ST-Attachment of bank account-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Directed to remit a certain amount-Attachment is directed to lifted. [S.12A, 80G, 269ST, Art. 226]

Ritu Mittal (Smt.) v. ITO (2024) 298 Taxman 112 (All.)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Principle of natural justice-Application was rejected-Matter was not heard and disposed on the date hearing-Matter is set aside to decide the matter after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. [Art. 226]

Gopal Vazirani v. PCIT (2024) 298 Taxman 515/466 ITR 376 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 264 :Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Capital gains-Intimation under section 143(1) is an order amenable to revision jurisdiction-Matter remanded to the Principle Commissioner to pass s fresh order on application of assessee.[S. 45, 48, 143(1), 264 Art. 226]

CIT v. Gopal Sharma (2024) 298 Taxman 49 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Method of accounting-Closing stock-Not recorded a specific finding that it was a case of no enquiry by Assessing Officer-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order is affirmed.[S.145(3), 260A]