Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sumit Export v. Asst. CIT (2023) 101 ITR 62 /148 taxmann.com 475 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Allotment of property-Date of acquisition of property to be reckoned with from date of allotment i.e., in year 1998-99, and thus sale of said office premises on 19-5-2012 would result in long term capital gains. [S. 2(29AA), 2(29B)]

Asst. CIT v. Electrosteel Casting Ltd. (2023)101 ITR 359 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 43(1) : Actual cost-Subsidy cannot be deducted from W.D.W of block of asset. [Explanation-10]

Asst. CIT v. Ansal Landmark (Karnal) Township Pvt. Ltd. (2023)101 ITR 6 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Amount ceasing to be liability-Necessary details not supplied to AO-Evidence produced for the first time-Matter remanded.[S. 254(1)]

Saranya Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd. v ITO (2023)101 ITR 60 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)

S. 40A (3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits –Additional evidence-No reasonable cause for admitting additional evidence.[ITATR. 29.]

Raju Kashyap v. Asst. CIT (2023)101 ITR 37 (SN)/ 222 TTJ 269 (SMC) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Business expediency-Claim not rebutted-Disallowance quashed.[R. 6DD]

Asst. CIT v. Dhar Construction Co. (2023)199 ITD 124/ 101 ITR 49 (SN)(Gauhati)(Trib)

S. 40(b)(v) : Amounts not deductible-Partner-Remuneration-Payments as per partnership deed-Permissible limit-Disallowance is not justified. [S. 15, 192]

Savla Agencies v. JCIT (2023)101 ITR 57 (SN) (All) (Trib)

S. 40(b)(iv) : Amounts not deductible-Partner-Interest-Interest payment to legal heirs of dead partner-Already subjected to tax deducted at source-Cannot be disallowed on the ground of passing of entry-Remanded. [S. 36(1) (iii), 194A]

Umananda Rice Mill Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)101 ITR 140/ 148 taxmann.com 211 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Documentation charges-Payment paid by assessee-Shown in return of receipts and taxes paid-Disallowance not warranted.[S. 194C]

Profarm Seed India P. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)101 ITR 120/ 198 ITD 113 (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Business expenditure-Disallowance-Remuneration to directors-Prior to 01.04.2015-Deduction allowable-Audit fees-addition justified.

Play Games 24×7 P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 241 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Interest-Royalty-Fes for technical services-Advertisement expenses-Server for advertisement located outside India-No control with assessee over functioning of interface provided-No element of Fee for technical services or Royalties-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 9(1)(vii), 195]