S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Assessment order passed beyond time limit of 21 months for completion of assessment under section 153(1)-Void ab initio-Date on which appeal had been filed by assessee, should not be included in computing delay in filing appeal as appeal had reached Registry of Tribunal on said date. [S. 143(3) 253]

S. 147 : Reassessment-Recorded reasons-Un explained cash credits-Addition is made on commission income-Issue is not subject matter of notice under section 148-Reassessment order is quashed. [S. 37(1), 68,148]

S. 147: Reassessment-Notice to verify the deposits and withdrawals-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 148]

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice is issued by the Assessing Officer who had no jurisdiction-Reassessment is bad in law-Additional grounds-Question of law is admitted. [S. 2(7A), 120, 124(3), 143(3), 148]

S. 147 : Reassessment-Alleged bogus long term capital gains-Sale of shares-Information from Investigation Wing-Non application of mind-Reassessment is quashed. [S. 10(38), 45]

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account-Estimation of profit-Rejection of books of account is justified-Estimate of @ 5 percent of the turnover is affirmed-Jurisdiction issue is not challenged in the course of assessment proceedings hence not entertained-Reassessment is affirmed. [S. 124(3),145(3), 147, 148]

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-DRP cannot set aside any proposed variation or issue any direction for further enquiry-Direction issued to the Assessing Officer to pass a speaking order in respect of Permanent Entablement is contrary to the provisions of section 144C(8) [S. 9(1)(i), 144C(8)]

S. 143(3): Assessment-Jurisdiction-Assessment order passed by non-Jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Contrary to CBDT instruction No. 1 of 2011 dt. 1-4-2011-Order is bad in law. [S. 119,124(3), 143(2)]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice under section 143(2) was issued by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify as to territorial jurisdiction at the time of issue of notice. [S. 143(2)]

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Invalid return-CPC has no jurisdiction to process the return and disallow the claim. [S. 139(9)]