Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Vodafone Idea Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (IT) (2023)457 ITR 189 /152 taxmann.com 575 / 334 CTR 39 (Karn)(HC) Editorial: Order in Vodafone Idea Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (IT)(2015) 44ITR 330(Bang)(Trib) is reversed.SLP of Revenue is dismissed on account of delay of 222 days and also on merits, DCIT v.Vodafone Idea Ltd. (2024)300 Taxman 364 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Payment to Non-Resident telecommunication operators for provision of bandwidth and inter-connectivity usage-Not royalty-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Expansion of definition of royalty inserted later-Assessee cannot be expected to foresee future amendment at time of payment in earlier assessment y ears-Jurisdiction-No jurisdiction to tax income arising from extra-territorial source-Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement-Sovereign document between two countries-Applicable in Proceedings under Section 201 of the Act-DTAA-India-Belgium. [S. 195]

PCIT v. Ziauddin Walve (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline .org

S. 68 : Cash credits – Long term capital gains – Penny stock –Not subjected to any enquiry by SEBI – Sold through DMAT account – STT paid – Purchased at a rate as low as Rs.2.5/- to Rs.3/- per share and they were sold at a rate extremely as high as Rs.125/- to Rs.185/- per share- Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed . [ S. 10(38), 45, 260A ]

Chirag Tejpraksh Dangi v.ITO (Mum)( Trib)www.itatonline .org

S. 68 : Cash credits – Long term capital gains – Penny stock –Information from Investigation wing from Kolkata- Estimation of commission – Not subjected to any enquiry by SEBI -Statement of the assessee – Sold through DMAT account – Addition as cash credits and estimation of commission is deleted . [ S. 10(38), 45 , 69C, 131 ]

FCS Manufacturing (India) Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (Inv) (2023) 456 ITR 89/ 330 CTR 151/ 221 DTR 64/(2022) 145 taxmann.com 393 (Guj)(HC)

S. 281B : Provisional attachment-Should be exercised in judicial manner-Order modified. [S.133A(3)(ia), Art. 226]

ITO v. Nagendranath Khuntia (2023)456 ITR 631 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Acquittal after 29 years of launching of prosecution-No finding against assessee in penalty proceedings-Trial Court is justified in a. 277]

Dr. A. M. Arun (2023)456 ITR 110 / 154 taxmann.com 661 (Mad)(HC) Meera Arun (Smt.) v. ITD(2023)456 ITR 110 / 154 taxmann.com 661 (Mad)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Failure to issue notice treating director as Principal Officer of company-Cannot be decided in writ proceedings. [S. 2(35), 278B, Art. 226]

Industrial Cables (India) Ltd. v. CIT (2023) 456 ITR 798 (P&H)(HC)

S. 273 : Penalty-Advance tax-false estimate-Failure to pay-Mere mistake in mentioning particular provision-Subsequent correction of mistake-Order of penalty is valid. [S. 273(2)(a), 273(2)(aa)]

PCIT v. Ind Swift Laboratories Ltd. (2023)456 ITR 270 /153 taxmann.com 763 / 335 CTR 1105(P&H)(HC)

S. 271AAA : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007-Surrender of undisclosed income-Cover discrepancies-Levy of penalty is not valid.[S. 132]

CIT v. S. Kumar Tyres Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (2023)456 ITR 637 /147 taxmann.com 49 (MP)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Capital or revenue-Debatable-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified.

PCIT v. Shivshahi Punarvasan Prakalp Ltd. (2023)456 ITR 336 /155 taxmann.com 408 (Bom)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Two views-Interest receivable is written off-Explanation 2 is prospective in application-Prior to 1-6-2015 inadequacy of enquiry cannot be the ground for passing the revision order.