Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ACIT v. Anilkumar Gopikishan Agrawal (2023) 454 ITR 531 /294 Taxman 68 / 334 CTR 220 (SC) Editorial : Anilkumar Gopikishan Agrawal v. ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 25 (Guj)(HC), reversed.

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Belongs or belongs to-Pertains or pertaining-Search conducted prior to date of amendment-Prior to and after amendment by Finance Act, 2015, with effect from 1-6-2015-Amendment brought to section 153C vide Finance Act, 2015 shall be applicable to searches conducted under section 132 before 1-6-2015, i.e., date of amendment. [S. 132, Art. 136]

Dy. CIT v. U. K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 441/ 294 Taxman 72 / 334 CTR 217 (SC) Editorial : From the Judgement of Delhi High Court, ARN Infrastructure Ltd v.ACIT (2017) Delhi)(HC), BJN Holdings lTD v. Dy.CIT (2020) 15 ITR-OL 408 (Delhi)(HC), PCIT v. Ankush Salija (2019) 419 ITR 431 (Delhi)(HC), ITA No. 904 pf 2017 dt 30-10-2017, ITA No. 73 of 2017 dt. 6-3-2019 (Bom)(HC), ITA No. 1252 & 1251 of 2016 dt. 4-1-2019 (Bom)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-No incriminating material is found-Deletion of addition is justified-Department at liberty to initiate reassessment proceedings in accordance with law.[S. 132, 147, 148]

PCIT (C) v. Panchmukhi Management Services Pvt. Ltd. (2023)456 ITR 358/294 Taxman 423 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Panchmukhi Management Services Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 456 ITR 332 / 153 taxmann.com 297 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Share capital-Cash credits-Bogus accommodation entries-No incriminating material brought on record -SLP of Revenue is dismissed.[S.68, 132, 153A]

PCIT v. Saroj Sudhir Kothari (2023) 154 taxmann.com 359 (Bom)(HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue, dismissed, PCIT v. Saroj Sudhir Kothari (2023) 294 Taxman 598 (SC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-No incriminating material-Unabated assessments-No addition can be made-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 132, Art.226]

PCIT v. Kutch Salt and Allied Industries Ltd. (2023) 457 ITR 44 / 294 Taxman 124 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Ledge account-Not incriminating material-Unabated and concluded assessment-Addition cannot be made. [S. 132, 143(3), 153A(1)(b)]

PCIT v. Shyama Power India Ltd. (2023) 294 Taxman 652 /(2024)461 ITR 350 (Gau.)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Ledge account-Not incriminating material-Unabated and concluded assessment u/s 143(1)-Failure to deduct tax at source-No disallowance can be made. [S.10 (26), 40(a)(ia), 132, 143(1)]

PCIT v. Rajesh Mohanbhai Patel (2023) 294 Taxman 279 (Guj)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Alleged bogus long-term capital gains-No incriminating material-assessments cannot be substantiated. [S.45, 68, 69C, 132]

PCIT v. JPM Tools Ltd. (2023) 154 taxmann.com 44 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Jay Ace Technologies Ltd. (2023) 294 Taxman 602 (SC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-No incriminating material was found-Share capital-Investor companies had ample funds to make investment in share capital-Opportunity of cross examination was not provided-Deletion of the addition was affirmed. [S. 68, 260A]

PCIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd. (2023) 294 Taxman 70/ 332 CTR 729/ 225 DTR 497 (SC) Editorial : Refer, PCIT v. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 212/ 293 Taxman 141/ 332 CTR 385/ 225 DTR 105 (SC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Total income-Completed Assessments remain unabated -No addition permissible for such years in absence of incriminating material having been found in search – Completed or unabated assessments can be reopened under Section 147 or 148 of the Act-Miscellaneous application of Revenue is dismissed. [2(45), 131, 132, 132A, 143(1), 143(3), 147, 148, 150(2), 285BA]

PCIT v. Saroj Sudhir Kothari (2023) 455 ITR 379/294 Taxman 598 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Saroj Sudhir Kothari (2023) 154 taxmann.com 359 (Bom)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-No incriminating material-Addition cannot be made in respect of unabated assessments-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 132 Art. 136]