Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT v. Bajrang Lal Bamalwa (2023)107 ITR 130 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-No incriminating material found in search-Alleged bogus long-term capital gains-Amalgamation approved by High Court-No evidence to prove transactions were bogus-Addition is deleted-No search on assessee-No assessment order could have been passed. [S. 10(38) 132, 133A]

Kuldeep Kumar v. ITO (2023)107 ITR 241 / 226 TTJ 341 (Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Cash credits-Undisclosed income-Source of cash deposits explained-Addition not sustainable-Reassessment invalid.[S. 68, 148]

Khed Economic Infrastructure P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 83 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-With in four years-Raised specific query in the original assessment proceedings-No new tangible material-Reassessment is bad in law.[S. 143(3 148]

Asst. CIT (OSD) v. S. S. Gas Lab Asia P. Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 482 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment is quashed. [S. 148]

Eaton Power Quality P. Ltd. v. Dy. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 195 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Legal issue-Can be raised at any time-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to consider additional ground of limitation on Dispute Resolution Panel’s Direction. [S. 92CA, 153, 254(1), ITATR.11]

Asst. CIT v. Montecarlo Construction Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 411 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Rejection of books of account-Estimate of gross profit-No purchases from shell companies-Declared greater profit from earlier years-No addition is warranted.

Pravinchandra R. Patel v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.) Ansuben P.Patel (Smt) v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.) Neothech Education Foundation v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Information in Annual Information return is not incriminating material-Addition is deleted.[S. 5, 50C, 132]

Asst. CIT v. Vibhu International Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 6 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Factum of amalgamation intimated to Assessing Officer with request to cancel Permanent Account Number of amalgamating company-Notice in name of non-existent entity-Not sustainable.[S. 147]

Cricket South Africa (NPC) v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2023)107 ITR 93 (SN)/226 TTJ 936 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded-Factual misstatements and inaccuracies-Sanction of commissioner without proper application of mind-Dispute Resolution Panel-Admitting errors-Reassessment is bad in law.[S.144C, 148, 151]

Asst. CIT v. Pradip Overseas Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 60 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Settlement Of Case-Settlement Commission passing order settling case-Binding on department-Assessing Officer has no power to reopen assessment for year forming part of Settlement-Recovery of tax-Companies-Insolvency resolution-Resolution plan as approved by committee of creditors approved by National Company Law Tribunal-Binding on all Parties-Dues not forming part of resolution plan stand extinguished-Department has no power to reopen assessment [S.148, 245C(1), 245D(4)]