Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Shalini Mittal (Ms.) v. ITO (2023) 295 Taxman 722 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Furnished copy sale deed and NHAI bonds-Non application of mind-Reassessment notice and order under section 148A(d) is quashed and set aside. [S. 45, 54, 54EC,148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Samriddhi Industries v. CBDT(2023) 295 Taxman 524 (MP)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing an opportunity before issue of notice-Business expenditure-Failure to file reply-Writ petition is dismissed.[S.148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Mukesh J. Ruparel v. ITO (2023) 295 Taxman 475 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Return was not filed-Purchase of immoveable property-Only five days time to file the reply-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 69, 148, 148A(b),148A(d), Art.226]

Knight Riders Sports Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)459 ITR 16/ 295 Taxman 537 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Payment to non-Resident-Mangement and consultancy fees-Change of opinion-Query raised in the course of assessment proceedings-No power to review the order-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 40(a)(i), 147, 148A(b).148A(d), 195, Art. 226]

Anokhi Realty (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 457 ITR 695/ 295 Taxman 60 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Succession to business-Notice in the name of non-existing entity-Assessing Officer was informed-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 147, 170, Art. 226]

Utpala Pradeep Jain v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 322 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice on dead person-Order is quashed and set aside.[S. 147, 159, 292B, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Network Programme India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 335 / (2024) 461 ITR 37(Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital work-in-progress-Change of opinion-Audit objection-No fresh tangible material-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S.143(3) 148 260A]

PCIT v. Network Programme India Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 335/(2024)461 ITR 37 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital work-in-progress-Change of opinion-Audit objection-No fresh tangible material-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[S.143(3) 148 260A]

Amneal Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 197 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Special economic zones-Explanation was furnished in the course of assessment proceedings-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.10AA, 148, Art. 226]

Ankur V. Bankda v. ACIT (2023) 295 Taxman 430 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Unexplained investments-Failure to provide alleged SEBI Investigation report-Syncom Formulations Limited-Long term gains-Assessment order is set aside-Remanded back to Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) with a direction to make available to assessee a copy of report of SEBI relied upon in reasons to believe for re-opening of assessment. [S. 10(38) 69, 144B, 148, Art. 226]