Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Darpan P. Chandaliya v. ITO (2023) 295 Taxman 717 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Cash deposited in bank-Suspicious of unaccounted money-Reason to suspect and no reason to believe-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 68, 148, Art. 226]

Ashraf Chitalwala v. Dy. CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 174/(2024)461 ITR 235 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-No new tangible material-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 54F, 148, Art. 226]

Meer Gems v. ACIT (2023) 154 taxmann.com 646 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, ACIT v. Meer Gems (2023) 295 Taxman 120 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Notional foreign exchange loss-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.37(1), 148, Art. 226]

DCB Bank Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 458 ITR 716 /295 Taxman 387 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bad debts written off-Book profit-Exempt income-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S.14A, rt. 36(1)(vii), 44AB,115JB, 148, Art. 226]

Mukand Ltd. v. UOI (2023) 295 Taxman 13 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Brought forward depreciation-Capital gains-Business income [S. 28(i), 32, 71, 148, Art.226]

Citius Tech Healthcare Technology (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 761/[2024] 461 ITR 249 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Special economic zones-Splitting up or reconstruction-No failure to disclose full and true material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S.10AA, 148,Form No 56F, Art. 226]

Oriental Aromatics Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 367(Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-S.147: Reassessment-Foreign exchange fluctuation-No failure to disclose material facts-Audit objection-Notice of reassessment and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 4, 148, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Blue Heaven Griha Nirman (P.) Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 11 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. Blue Heaven Griha Nirman (P.) Ltd(2022) 441 ITR 621/ 285 Taxman 663 (Cal)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Revaluation of asset of firm-Transfer of revalued reserve to partners’ accounts-Section 45(3) is applicable in year of transfer of capital asset by partner to firm by way of capital contribution-Re valuation is not colourable device-Reassessment is not valid-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S.10(2A), 45(3), 148, Art. 136]

Sunil Jain v. ITD (2023) 459 ITR 276 /295 Taxman 10(SC) Editorial: Sunil Jain v.. ITD (2022) 289 Taxman 688/ 20 ITR-OL409 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Unexplained money-Limited scrutiny-Cash deposit-Demonetisation-Pendency of appeal-Not adjudicated in the original assessment proceedings-Reassessment notice is valid.[S. 69A, 148, Art. 136]

ACIT v. Meer Gems (2023) 295 Taxman 120 (SC) Editorial: Meer Gems v. ACIT (2023) 154 taxmann.com 646 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Notional foreign exchange loss-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed.[S.37(1), 148, Art. 136]