Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Tungabhadra Minerals (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 291 Taxman 250 / 455 ITR 311/ 331 CTR 73/ 222 DTR 353 (Bom.)(HC) Salgaocar Mining Industries (P) Ltd v Dy. CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 250 / 455 ITR 311/ 331 CTR 73/ 222 DTR 353 (Bom.)(HC) Salitho ores (P) Ltd v Dy. CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 250 / 455 ITR 311/ 331 CTR 73/ 222 DTR 353 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Financial hardship-Rejection of application without reasoning-Remanded back to Principal Commissioner to reconsider issue and pass an appropriate order after granting an opportunity of hearing to assessee. [S. 132, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd. (2023) 291 Taxman 229 (Bom)(HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed PCIT v. Vedanta Ltd (2023)291 Taxman 205 / 146 taxman.com 34 (SC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Commission earned by non-resident agent carrying on business of selling Indian goods outside India could not be said to be income which had accrued and/or arisen in India and, thus, assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on payment of such commission to foreign agents.[S. 40(a)(i)]

CIT (TDS) v. Vodafone Cellular Ltd (2023) 291 Taxman 447 (SC) Editorial: CIT (TDS) v. Vodafone Cellular Ltd (2021) 131 tamann.com 191 (Bom)(HC)

S. 194H : Deduction at source-Commission or brokerage-Discounts given by assessee-telecommunication Company on the sale of prepaid SIM cards to distributors-SLP admitted.

Surendra Commercial & Exim (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 291 Taxman 202 (SC) Editorial: SLP dismissed as withdrawn Surendra Commercial & Exim (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 288 Taxman 580 (Cal)(HC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source-Contractors-Reimbursement of expenditure in absence of evidence-Liable to deduct tax at source [S. 40(a)(ic)]

Devendra Babulal Jain v. ITO (2023) 456 ITR 141/291 Taxman 333 (Guj)(HC)

S. 179 : Private company-Liability of directors-No liability if the director takes steps by filing an appeal before CIT (A)-Order was quashed and set aside. [S. 156, 222,226(3), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Vinita Chaurasia [2023] 291 Taxman 362 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure-Document-without further investigation-No addition when the document is in doubt. [S. 132]

Stalco Consultancy & Systems (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) (2023) 455 ITR 308/ 291 Taxman 390 /333 CTR 205 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Notice issued beyond six years after the end of the relevant assessment year-Notice issued without withdrawing the first notice dated 31-3-2021-Order is bad in law.[S. 148, 148A, Art. 226]

Boeing Company v. UOI (2023) 291 Taxman 406 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees for technical services-Tax residency certificate-Reply filed by the assessee was had not been properly considered-Orders set aside-DTAA-India-Singapore-USA [S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii),148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 12, Art, 226]

Sylvesa Infotech (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (2023) 457 ITR 433/ 291 Taxman 375/ 332 CTR 803/ 226 DTR 13 (Orissa) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Assessing Officer issued on assessee notices under section 148 dated 8-4-2021 seeking to reopen assessment for assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17-Mandatory procedure of a prior inquiry under section 148A had not been followed-notices were unsustainable in law and quashed-Sanction-Sanction of Additional Commissioner and not only from Principal Chief Commissioner-Notice was quashed. [S. 148, 151, Art. 226]

Ester Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 291 Taxman 172 (Delhi)(HC).Editorial : SLP dismissed as withdrawn , Ester Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 292 Taxman 1 (SC )

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Entry operator-Monetary limit of less than 50 lakhs-Subsequent information-Writ petition was dismissed.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]