Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT v. Sitel India Ltd. (2022)97 ITR 65 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Transfer pricing-Conducted detailed functions, assets and risk analysis of international transactions-Documentations not rejected-Penalty not warranted. [S. 92C, 92D R.10D]

Kishor Madhav Paranjape v Dy. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 45 (SN.) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Additional evidence-Capital asset-Failure to declare capital gain-Land outside 8 Km-Penalty order set aside-Mater remanded. [S.2(14)(iii)), 275 (1) (C).]

Gulshan Chemicals Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)97 ITR 59 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Interest-Donation-of small sums-Penalty not leviable merely because receipts could not be located. [S. 37(1), 80G]

Lear Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)100 ITR 3 (SN) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Neither Assessment order nor penalty notice specifying whether proceedings initiated for concealment of income or filing inaccurate particulars of income-Penalty is not valid [S. 274]

Dy. CIT v. Jagson International Ltd. (2022)100 ITR 69 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Difference between interest declared in books and Form 26AS-levy of penalty is not justified [Form, 26AS]

Krishan Kumar Sharma v. ITO (2022)100 ITR 78 (Amritsar) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Not mentioning nature of concealment in notice-Notice invalid-Levy of penalty is not valid.[S. 274]

Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd v.ACIT (2022)99 ITR 42 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Deduction of expenditure-Sale and lease back-Depreciation-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 32, 35E]

Dy. CIT v. Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Co. Ltd. (2022) 217 TTJ 875 / 215 DTR 17 (Jabalpur)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Book profit-Prior period expenses-Loss as per regular assessment-Deletion of penalty is valid. [S. 115JB]

ACIT v. East West Developers (2022) 219 TTJ 53 (UO)/98 ITR 33 (SN) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Survey-Surrender of income-Included in the return of income-Reported income and assessed income is same-Deletion of penalty is valid [S. 133A]

Kirloskar Chillers Pvt. Ltd. v. Jt. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 74 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bogus purchases-Survey-Additional income declared in the revised return-Penalty was deleted.