Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


N. Periyasamy v. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 779 (Mad)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Sale proceeds of agricultural land partly invested in purchasing a house site and balance deposited in bank-Alternative remedy-Appeal pending before CIT(A)-Rectification application-Writ petition dismissed.[S. 154, 156,246A, Art. 226]

New Age Buildtech Pvt. Ltd v. NFAC [2023] 151 taxmann.com 66 / (2025) 483 ITR 768 (Bom)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Amalgamation intimated to Income-tax authorities which has merged-Assessment proceedings against non existing company not valid-Participation in the proceedings by the assessee cannot operate as an estoppel against law. [Art. 226]

Kovi Guravaiah Naidu.v. NFAC (2025) 483 ITR 294 (AP)(HC)

S.143(3): Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Order passed without giving assessee adequate opportunity of hearing-Order is set aside.[Art. 226]

C. Prasannakumaran Unnithan v. CIT (Appeals) [2023] 156 taxmann.com 397 / (2025) 483 ITR 288 (Karn)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Existence of alternate remedy-Person who fails to avail of opportunity of being heard-No violation of principles of natural justice if order is passed-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 246A, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Backbone Projects [2023] 157 taxmann.com 303 / (2025) 483 ITR 190 (Guj)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Accounts-Rejection of books of account-Estimation of profits-Tribunal deleting addition to income by estimating profit-Justified.[S. 133(6), 144, 260A]

Mangal Chand v. Add. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 187 (Mad)(HC)

S.143(3): Assessment-Principal of natural justice-Order passed set aside. [Art. 226]

Vinplex India Pvt. Ltd v. NFAC 2023] 155 taxmann.com 116 / (2025) 483 ITR 30 (Mad)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Service of notice-Change of address-Notices sent to old address provided by assessee in revised return-Department aware of new address while passing order of refund for subsequent assessment year Mistake due to adoption of mode of communication electronically-Assessment order quashed-Matter remanded with direction to pass speaking order within 45 days [S.69, 282, Rule 127]

Dilip Mehta v. ITD [2024] 166 taxmann.com 280 / (2025) 483 ITR 662 (MP)(HC) Editorial : ITD v. Dilip Mehta [2024] 300 Taxman 584 (SC), SLP dismissed due to delay of 200 days.

S. 132(3) : Prohibitory order-valuable article-Liquor bottles are valuable articles within the meaning of section 132. Liquor bottles can be seized-Prohibitory order in respect of liquor bottles-Not valid.[S. 132, 133(1)]

Arise Industries and Agency Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT [2024] 167 taxmann.com 152 / (2025) 483 ITR 782 (Mad)(HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Search and seizure-Registered office of assessee in Coimbatore Seizure of incriminating documents directly linking involvement of assessee into business of lotteries carried out within jurisdiction of Kolkata Circle Transfer notification from Coimbatore to Kolkata-Incriminating material with regard to involvement of assessee in lottery business for evasion of taxes within Kolkata jurisdiction-Principal Commissioner rightly transferred assessee’s case from Coimbatore to Kolkata where sufficient material for assessment existed. [S. 132, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Inductis India Pvt. Ltd (2023) 157 taxmann.com 87 / (2025) 483 ITR 492 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: PCIT v. Inductis India Pvt. Ltd [2025] 175 taxmann.com 423 (SC), SLP dismissed on account of delay of 387 days.

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Interest on delayed receivables-Selection of comparables-Exclusion of comparables by Tribunal on ground of functional dissimilarities-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.92B, 92CA]