Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dnyaneshwar Baburao Kathe v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 85 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Agriculturist-Bank deposits-Non-filing of ITR-additions on account of unexplained cash deposited in savings bank account & income from LTCG on the sale of agricultural land-ex-parte assessment order-Assessee was required to substantiate his income before the AO with proper and supporting evidence-matter remanded.

B. K. Rajanna v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 677 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Demonetisation-Specified Bank notes-Sales-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer.[S. 115BBE]

Karni Infraprojects (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 465 / 173 taxmann.com 576 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits-Share capital-Share premium-Assessee had demonstrated that subscribing companies were having adequate reserves and surpluses to invest-Addition is deleted.

Manjulaben Himmatlal Jain v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 345 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Stamp valuation-Allotment letter-Registration-AO made addition as stamp duty value more than consideration paid-Consideration paid was as per allotment latter and not date of registration-Entitled to the benefits of proviso to Section 56(2)(vii)(b). [S. 56(2)(viib), 143(2)]

Vachaspati Sharma v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 537 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Interest on compensation-Assessable as income from other sources. [S.10(37), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S 28]

Parasmani Gems (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2025] 210 ITD 215 (Ahd)(Trib.)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Share premium-Conversion of a loan into share capital does not exonerate the assessee from the application of S.56(2)(viib)-Addition is affirmed. [S. 56(2)(viib)]

Babubhai Ramanbhai Patel v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 165 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Purchase of properties/payment of sale consideration & taking possession of property-Subsequent registration of sale Deed in the relevant AY-Addition deleted-Non-speaking order-Violation of principles of natural justice. [S. 56(2)(x)(b)]

Rajeev Vasudeva v. Dy. CIT [2025] 210 ITD 442 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 54F: Capital gains–Investment in residential house-50% ownership in property-Does not own more than one house at the time of the transfer of the original capital asset, would be entitled to claim the exemption u/s.54F, even if they lack absolute ownership of the property they are selling. [S. 45]

Dhanraj Kochar (HUF) v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 636 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Property purchased by HUF-Through General Power of Attorney held by a coparcener-Held, valid transaction-Eligible for exemption. [S. 45]

Dy.CIT v. Minal Urmil Shah (2025) 233 TTJ 805/ 211 ITD 136 / (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Valuation for the purposes of Stamp Duty-Development rights-Assessee holding the land title in her name only for technical purposes-development rights of the land transferred to the partnership firm where assessee was a partner-.Assignment of development rights provision is not applicable. [S. 45]