Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dun & Bradstreet Technologies & Data Services (P.) Ltd v.PCIT (2024) 297 Taxman 323 (Mad)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-concessional rate of tax on dividend distributed to its foreign holding company-Not justified in rejecting revision application on ground that assessee could have filed a revised return or an appeal under section 248-DTAA-India-Mauritius-Matter remanded to decide on merit. [S. 9(1)(i), 90, 139(5), 195, 248, art. 10(2),Art.226]

Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 297 Taxman 412 /464 ITR 236 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Fringe benefit tax-Included in the return as abundant caution-CIT(A) held that the amount included in the return is not chargeable to tax-Revision application is filed after 5-6 years-Application for condonation of application is rejected-Allowing the petition the Court held that since it took a long time for Commissioner (Appeals) to dispose assessee’s appeal, Commissioner should have condoned delay and decided matter on merits.[S. 115WB, 143(1), 250, Art. 226]

PCIT v. BT Global Communications India (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 328/337 CTR 179 /466 ITR 714(Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order and on merit affirmed by High Court. [80IA(4)(ii), 260A]

PCIT v. Trojan Developers (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 177 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Shares at premium-Confirmation was filed-Assessing Officer passed the order after verification-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision is affirmed. [S. 56(2) (viib), 143(3), 260A]

PCIT v. National Dairy Development Board (2024) 297 Taxman 306 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Depreciable assets-Block of assets-Claim of set off of brought forward long term capital loss against short term capital gain under section 50-Plausible view-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 2(11), 32,72,143(3), 260A]

PCIT v. R. K. Jain Infra Projects (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 369 /464 ITR 584 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. R. K. Jain Infra Projects (P.) Ltd(2023) 293 Taxman 465 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business expenditure-Specific query was raised in the original assessment proceedings-Mere failure to issue notice under section 133(6) did not warrant exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 37(1), 133(6), 143(3), Art. 136]

CIT (IT) v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 371/463 ITR 63 /337 CTR 1 (SC) Editorial : CIT (IT) v. Bharti Airtel Ltd (2024) 159 taxmann.com 315 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay 4 years and 100 days-Failed to give any adequate or sufficient reasons-Appeal was dismissed as time barred-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [Art. 136]

Coda Global LLC v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024) 297 Taxman 299/339 CTR 314 /466 ITR 687 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Central Processing Centre (CPC)-Unable to input it foreign bank account details by imputing SWIFT code and IBAN as per ITR-Bank account is validated by revenue on 7-7-2023 and refund was made in October 2023 without interest-High Court directed the Revenue to pay interest on refund amount at rate specified in section 244A from 1-5-2022 to 5-10-2023. [S. 143(1), Art. 226]

IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 297 Taxman 105/338 CTR 869 (Karn)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Pendency of appeal before DRP-No recoverable demand-Refund cannot be withheld to be adjustment towards anticipated demand. [S.144C(5), 220,254(1), Art.226]

Namudha v. ITO (2024) 297 Taxman 243 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Pendency of appeal-Directed to the recovery till disposal of the appeal by the CIT(A). [S. 50C, 56(2)(x), 250, Art. 226]