Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Tiong Woon Project & Contracting Pte. Ltd. v. CBDT (2024) 297 Taxman 434 /463 ITR 641 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Delay in filing return-Pendency of ruling before Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR)-Genuine hardship-Delay is condoned-Directed to pay cost of Rs 50000 each petition. [S.119(2)(b), 245R(2), Art. 226]

Optra Health (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (HQ) (2024) 297 Taxman 481 / 462 ITR 238/336 CTR 489 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Invalid return-Condonation of delay-Central Board of Direct Taxes-Genuine hardship should be construed in a liberal manner-Delay is directed to be condoned [S. 119(2)(b), 139(9) Art. 226]

Akshara Enterprises (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2024) 297 Taxman 422 / 339 CTR 380 (Tel.)(HC)

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Search and seizure-Transfer from Hyderabad to Mumbai-Opportunity of hearing was given-Transfer is justified-Writ petition dismissed. [Art. 226]

K. S. Bilawala v. PCIT (2024) 297 Taxman 464 /463 ITR 766 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Compensation wrongly shown as taxable-Application for condonation of delay of revised return-Genuine hardship-Refusing to condone the delay can result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated. As against this, when the delay is condoned, the highest that can happen is that a cause would be decided on merits after hearing the parties-Delay is condoned-Directed to decide on merits. [S. 119(2)(b),143(1), Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Art.226]

CIT (IT) v. Piaggio & C.S.P.A (2024) 297 Taxman 9 (Bom)(HC)

S. 115A : Foreign companies-Tax-Dividends-Royalty-Technical services fees-Determination of tax in certain cases-New agreement and not extension of the licence and Technical Assistance agreement tax rate is 10.56% under section 115A instead of 20 % under the India-Italy DTAA-No substantial question of law. [S.9(1)(vi),260A, art. 12]

PCIT v. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.[2024] 297 Taxman 225 (SC). Editorial : PCIT v. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 84/146 taxmann.com 131 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92CA : Transfer pricing-Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Arm’s Length price-No interest was paid to creditor or supplier nor any interest has been earned from unrelated party-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed.[Art. 136]

PCIT v. Sony India (P.) Ltd (2024) 297 Taxman 118 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-AMP expenses in respect of products of AE-Comparables chosen by TPO had a net margin lower than that registered by assessee, no upward adjustment was required to be made. [S.92CA, 260A]

CIT v. IGE & CNCC (Joint Venture) (2024) 297 Taxman 293/461 ITR 266 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. IGE & CNCC (Joint Venture)(2015) 64 taxmann.com 484 (Hyd)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax- International transaction-Transfer Pricing Officer is not empowered to hold transaction as sham transaction-The questions of law with respect to the powers and jurisdiction of Transfer Pricing Officer are kept open for being considered in an appropriate case. [S.92CA, Art. 136]

Societe De Participations Financieres Et Industrielles Spafi(2024) 297 Taxman 75 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 90 :Double taxation relief-A notification under section 90(1) would be a mandatory condition to give effect to a DTAA, or any protocol changing its terms or conditions, which would have effect of altering existing provisions of law; for a party to claim benefit of a same treatment clause, based on entry of DTAA between India and another state which is member of OECD, relevant date would be entering into treaty with India and not a later date, when, after entering into DTAA with India, such country becomes an OECD member, in terms of India’s practice-OECD Model Convention-art, 24-Writ petition is dismissed. [ITR. 128, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Nirja Publishers & Printers (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 448 /466 ITR 646 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 80IC : Special category states-Manufacture of books-Eligible for deduction-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S.260A]