Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


GM Modular Private Limited v. PCIT (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org .

S. 270A: Penalty – Under-reporting of income – Disallowance of employees’ contribution to PF/ESI – Addition already made in intimation u/s 143(1) – No “under-reported income” – Claim based on jurisdictional High Court judgment – Issue debatable – No penalty leviable – Revision u/s 264 maintainable – Commissioner cannot reject revision without reasons – Penalty and revision order quashed. [S. 36(1)(va), 143(1), 143(3), 153A, 264, Art .226 ]

Job G. Oommen v. UOI [2024] 169 taxmann.com 407 /(2025) 481 ITR 638 (Ker)(HC)

S. 281 : Certain transfers to be void-Recovery of tax-Notice of demand-Deceased-Transfer of property-First charge of State-Transfer becomes void-Over-riding effect of section 26B of 1963 Act-Creating first charge on State-Properties were subsequently purchased by petitioner from auction, buyer, Income-tax Department could not proceed against said properties lawfully in possession of petitioner for realizing arrears payable by deceased assessee under Income-tax Act. [S. 156,Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, s. 26B, Art.226]

PCIT v. Parivar Television Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 481 ITR 14 /(2026) 308 Taxman 186 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Parivar Television Pvt. Ltd (2025) 483 ITR 391/180 taxmann.co 109 (Guj)(HC)

S.271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Assessing Officer not recording satisfaction in assessment order that there had been violation of section 269SS-High Court quashed the penalty order-SLP dismissed.[S. 269SS, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Shyam Sunder Jindal (2025) 481 ITR 568/ 304 Taxman 1 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Shyam Sunder Jindal(2023) 296 Taxman 115 / (2024) 462 ITR 501 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Not specifying the charge in the notice-None of relevant columns had been indicated nor had irrelevant columns been struck off-Penalty notice was invalid in law-SLP dismissed. [S. 274, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Prabhu Poly Pipes Ltd. (2025) (2025) 481 ITR 503 / 176 taxmann.com 693 (Cal.) (HC) Editorial : PCIT v. Prabhu Poly Pipes Ltd. (2025) 481 ITR 506/306 Taxman 161 ((SC), SLP dismissed.

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Unsecured loans-AO raised queries, examined identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of creditors, and took a plausible view-General observation by PCIT without specific finding as to what inquiry was lacking-Revision order not sustainable. [S. 143(3), 153A]

PCIT v. Kanubhai Vanmalibhai Patel (2025)481 ITR 246 / [2025] 178 taxmann.com 133 (Guj.) (HC). Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, delay of 365 days, PCIT v. Kanubhai Vanmalibhai Patel (2025) 307 Taxman 6 (SC)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-AO allowed deduction under section 54B after detailed inquiry-View taken by AO reasonable and plausible-Twin conditions for section 263 not fulfilled-Revision order not sustainable. [S. 54B, 260A]

CIT v. Ramco Cements Ltd. [2025] 481 ITR 705 / 173 taxmann.com 226 (Mad)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Expert opinion of technical matters-Inspection of factory to decide the matter-Not perverse or any excess of jurisdiction. [S. 260A]

Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Ltd v. ITSC (2025) 481 ITR 356 / 179 taxmann.com 208 (Delhi)(HC) Western U.P. Power Transmission Co Ltd v. ITSC 2025) 481 ITR 356 / 179 taxmann.com 208 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Conditions-Applications of petitioners were validly filed before ITSC which legally and factually existed, i.e., much before Finance Act, 2021 was promulgated on 1-4-2021-Application shall be treated as pending applications to be considered by Interim Board-Direction was issued to consider application. [S. 119(2)(b), 153A, 245C(1), 245C(5) Art. 226]

Pradeep Kumar Naredi. v. UOI (2025) 481 ITR 346 / 170 taxmann.com 715 (Cal) (HC) RSB Industries Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 481 ITR 346 / 170 taxmann.com 715 (Cal) (HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Conditions-Abolition of Settlement Commission-Interim Board Settlement Commission inoperative from 1-2-2021-Application on 17-3-202, i.e., prior to date when assent of President of India had been received for Finance Act, 2021-Application was restored to file of Settlement Commission. [S. 24B. 245C(1), 245(5) Art. 226]

PCIT v. Bhimjibhai Madhavjibhai Bharad (2025) 481 ITR 454/ 178 taxmann.com 7 (SC) Editorial : Mohanbhai Madhavjibhai Bharad v.PCIT (2024) 465 ITR 323 / 158 taxmann.com 13 (Guj)(HC)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Compensation of acquisition of agricultural land-Assessee neither made aware of deduction of tax at source nor issued form 16A by deductor-Delay in application for refund under circumstances beyond control of assessee Assessee-Entitled to interest on refund-SLP delay of 457 days-SLP dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S.194LA, Art. 136]