Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT v. Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2023)453 ITR 447/ 293 Taxman 38/ 332 CTR 28/ 224 DTR 185 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd(2017) 398 ITR 603 (Bom)(HC), reversed. Refer Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd v. CIT (2014) 35 ITR 352/ (2016) 71 taxmann.com 287 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Capital gains -Cost of improvement -Paid to shareholders under Family Settlement – Discharge encumbrances-Cost of improvement -Relinquishment of rights – Assessing Officer accepting claim -Order erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue -Revision is justified- Order of High Court reversed. [S. 45, 48, 55(1)(b)]

Broadways Overseas Ltd. v.CIT (2023)453 ITR 774/ 292 Taxman 33 (SC) Editorial : Broadways Overseas Ltd v. CIT (P& H)(HC) (ITA No. 234 of 2009 dt. 22-11 -2013) is affirmed.

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Total income -Eligible profit -Export profit -Deduction under Section 80HHC to be computed on eligible profits only after reducing profits on which deduction availed of under Section 80IB of the Act -Revision was affirmed -Special Leave to appeal of the assessee was dismissed. [S.80HHC, 800IA(9), 80IB(13)]

Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 661/ 293 Taxman 312 / 332 CTR 137/ 224 DTR 305 (SC) Editorial: Decision of Delhi High Court, affirmed, CIT v. Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd (Delhi)(HC) (2016) 134 DTR 105 / 287 CTR 28 (Delhi)(HC).Editorial , Review petition is dismissed ,Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 661/ 293 Taxman 312 / 332 CTR 137/ 224 DTR 305 (SC)

S. 234A : Interest – Default in furnishing return of income – Levy of interest is mandatory. [S. 2(35), 5, 6(3)(ii), 131, 142(1), 143(2), 148, 282]

Milestone Systems A/S v. Dy. CIT (No. 1) (2023) 453 ITR 250 //150 taxmann.com 348 / 334 CTR 89/ 225 DTR 369 (Delhi)(HC) Milestone Systems A/S v. Dy. CIT (NO. 2) (2023)453 ITR 255 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 197 : Deduction at source – Certificate for lower rate -Non -Resident – Payments under distributor agreement —Certificate for withholding tax at rate of 9.99 Per Cent- Order set aside- Precedent -Supreme Court -Binding on Authorities. [S. 195, Rule 28AA, Art. 226]

Van Oord Acz India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 214 / 292 Taxman 405/ 226 DTR 89 (SC) Editorial: Observation of Delhi High Court set aside, Van Oord Acz India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2010) 323 ITR 130 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source – Non-resident -Observations of High Court that if in assessment proceedings of Netherlands company, that company held liable to be taxed in India and assessee would also be treated as in default -Observation was quashed. [S.40(a)(i)), Art. 136]

Anil Minda v. CIT (2023) 453 ITR 1 / 292 Taxman 407 /331 CTR 705 / 224 DTR 665 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Anil Minda (2010) 328 ITR 320 (Delhi)(HC) is affirmed.

S. 158BE : Block assessment – Time limit – Search and seizure – Limitation -From date of last Panchnama and not date of last warrant of authorisation [S. 132, 158C]

Garwal Logistics Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 524 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: Order of single judge is affirmed, Garhwal Logistics Ltd. v. ITO (2023)453 ITR 527 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 156 : Notice of demand -Bogus accommodation entries – lacked bona fides- Refund of money transferred to bank account in which Department had Lien for tax dues of company- Question of facts -The assessee was directed to approach appropriate Forum or Civil Court for recovery of its claim. [Art. 226]

Garhwal Logistics Ltd. v. ITO (2023)453 ITR 527 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Order single judge, Garwal Logistics Ltd. v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 524 (Delhi)(HC),

S. 156 : Notice of demand -Bogus accommodation entries – lacked bona fides- Refund of money transferred to bank account in which Department had Lien for tax dues of company- Question of facts –Single judge held that the assessee should approach appropriate Forum or Civil Court [Art. 226]

ITO v. Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia (2023) 453 ITR 417/ 293 Taxman 4 / 332 CTR 1 / 224 DTR 217 (SC) Editorial: Anil Kumar Gopikrishna Agarwal v.ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 25 /(2020) 186 DTR 273 / 313 CTR 520 (Guj)(HC), reversed.

S. 153C : Assessment – Income of any other person – Search – Provision applicable to searches conducted prior to date of amendment – (Prior to and after amendment by Finance Act, 2015, with Effect From 1-6-2015)-Search conducted prior to amendment with effect from 1-6-2015 – Books received by Assessing Officer of assessee after that date -Belongs or belong to – Deeming fiction that date of initiation of search would be date when Assessing Officer of third person receives seized material -Amended provision applicable -Interpretation of taxing statutes -Interpretation which effectuates object and purpose of statute preferred.-Amendment by substitution —Rule against retrospectivity. [S. 132]

ACIT v. Shruti Bhamasha Shah (2023) 453 ITR 735/ 293 Taxman 276 / 332 CTR 383 (SC)

S. 153C : Assessment – Income of any other person-Search-Prior to and after amendment by Finance Act, 2015, with effect from 1-6-2015 -Order of High Court set aside. [S. 132, Art. 136]