Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Umang Agarwall v. CIT [2025] 173 taxmann.com 282 / (2026) 484 ITR 100 (All)(HC) Editorial : Refer, CIT v. Umang Agarwal (2014) 365 ITR 164 (All)(HC), CIT v. Umang Agarwal (2026) 484 ITR 87 (All)(HC)

S. 158BC: Block assessment-Return-Search-Seizure of books of account-Return delayed-Tribunal treated delayed return as ‘non-est’ without considering impact of search and double taxation-Order was set aside, and matter was to be remanded for fresh adjudication. [S. 139(1), 158BB(1(ca), 158BC, 260A]

Landcraft Developers Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2026) 484 ITR 741 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Satisfaction note-Time limit for passing assessment order to be reckoned from 22-6-2022-Last date for passing assessment order has expired on 31-3-2024-Proceedings barred by limitation-Notice quashed and set aside.[S. 132, 153B, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Rohit Karan Jain [2025] 173 taxmann.com 184 / (2026) 484 ITR 109 (Gauhati)(HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Unaccounted income –Capital gains-Statement retracted-Retracted statement could not be termed as incriminating material-No addition could be made in respect of completed assessments on the basis of such retracted statement. [S. 132 (4), 132A, 260A]

UOI v. Misty Meadows Pvt Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 130/ 182 taxmann.com 653 (SC) Editorial : Misty Meadows Pvt Ltd v.UOI (2024) 465 ITR 630/ 299 Taxman 392 (P& H)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Warrant of Authorisation-Panchnama-No search against the assessee-Panchanama reflected the name of the assessee-Panchnama cannot be treated as warrant of authorisation-Assessment order is quashed as without jurisdiction-Existence of alternative remedy-Not bar to entertainment of writ petition where challenge is to jurisdiction exercised by Authority and interpretation of statutory provisions involved-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 132,153D, Art.136]

TVS Credit Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 622 (Mad)(HC)

S. 151A: Faceless assessment scheme-Jurisdiction to issue notice of reassessment lies with the faceless Assessment Officer, not the jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Notice and consequential order invalid.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art.226]

Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar v. Dy. CIT (2025) 178 taxmann.com 491 / (2026) 484 ITR 337 (Karn)(HC)

S. 151A: Faceless assessment scheme-Faceless Assessment-Reassessment-Jurisdiction-Mandatory-Notices and orders issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Invalid and to be quashed-Liberty to Department to revive petitions if Supreme Court holds in its favour. [S. 148 151A, Art. 226]

Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Charity Fund v.ITO (E) [2025] 180 taxmann.com 401 / (2026) 484 ITR 719 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Accumulation of income-The Assessing Officer had looked into the relevant details and particulars of accumulation during the course of the original assessment, and the assessee had provided all the details and documents during the original assessment proceedings-The order initiating the reassessment was based not only on a change of mind but also on non-application of the mind-Show cause notice and order quashed. [S. 11(2), 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), R. 17, Art. 226]

Vasuki Global Industrial Ltd. (formerly Vasuki Tradelink Pvt. Ltd.) v PCIT (2026) 484 ITR 698/308 Taxman 8 (Guj)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Strictures-Assessing Officer before issuance of notice to verify information made available on Insight Portal which suggests that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment-If necessary, Assessing Officer must conduct inquiry with prior approval of specified authority with respect to such information and only thereafter invoke provisions-Court observed that in future, no such action would be taken by authorities on basis of information made available on Insight Portal without verification by jurisdictional Assessing Officer.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Shree Cement Ltd v. ACIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 538 / (2026) 484 ITR 576(Raj)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Notice after six years Limitation-Order passed under section 148A(d) and consequent notice dated 1-5-2024 issued under section 148 after expiry of limitation period of six years on 31-3-2024-Barred by limitation-Faceless assessment-Faceless Assessment Officer has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice-Notices issued and order passed by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in contravention of provision invalid-Notice and order set aside.[S. 80-IA, 147, 148, 148A(b),148A(d), Art.226]

ACIT v. Indian Syntans Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2025] 176 taxmann.com 22 / (2026) 484 ITR 80 (Mad)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No new material-Change of opinion-Lease back-Notice and consequential proceedings quashed and set aside.[S. 143(1), 148, Art. 226]