Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Adivasi Unnati Seva Mandal v. ACIT (E) (2024) 232 TTJ 51 (UO) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 270A:Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Failure to establish the genuineness of donors-Anonymous donations-The issue is restored to the AO with a direction to give one more opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case with evidences to his satisfaction regarding the identity and creditworthiness of the donors and the genuineness of the transaction. [S.270A(a)]

Smt. Lingammal Ramaraju Shastra Prathistha Trust v. ACIT (E) (2024) 232 TTJ 827 / 38 NYPTTJ 1437 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Formal education through music school-Education-Running a petrol pump whose receipts are claimed to be utilised for meeting its charitable objects-Assessment order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue-Revision is quashed. [S. 2(15), 11(4), 11(4A)]

Manohars Catering v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 809 / 38 NYPTTJ 1189 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Pursuing wrong forum of appeal-Substantial justice-Delay is condoned-Matter is restored to CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. [S.176(3), 189, 250(4) 250(6), 253(5) 282, Rule. 127]

Church Educational Society v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib) Aurora Educational Society v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib) Karshak Vidya Parisad v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib)

S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Delay of 189 days in filing an appeal before the CIT(A) is condoned. [S. 143(1), 249(3), 250]

Medavakkam Vattara Nadargalikkiya Sangam v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 76 (UO)/ 38 NYPTTJ 1359 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Delay of 1694 days-Appeal is dismissed-CIT(A) cannot dismiss the appeal for default expressly or by inevitable implication; appellate authority has to decide the appeal on merits-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) to decide on merits.[S. 250]

Jyoti Prakash Deshmukh v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 314 / 244 DTR 1 / 38 NYPTTJ 1270 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Setting aside of matter back to the AO-Failure to file return-Best judgement assessment-No power to set aside the matter w.e.f 1st June 2001-the matter is restored back to the CIT(A) with a direction to call for a remand report from the AO and then adjudicate the matter. [S. 139, 142(1), 144]

Church Educational Society v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib) Aurora Educational Society v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib) Karshak Vidya Parisad v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 553 / 244 DTR 193 / 38 NYPTTJ 1419 (Hyd)(Trib)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Intimation-Rectification-No power to give direction or finding in respect of issues which are not subject before him. [S.143(1), 154, 249]

Krishna Gopal Raneja v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 1 ((UO) (Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 249 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Appeal filed before wrong forum-Delay of 657 days in filing an appeal-Form No 35 was filed before the AO instead of CIT(A)-Delay is condoned-Assessee is directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 to Prime Minister National Relief Fund within thirty days-CIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal on merits. [S. 249(3),250,253(3), 254(1)]

Raj Technology v. Dy.CIT (2024) 232 TTJ 945 / 38 NYPTTJ 1350 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Dumb document-Quotations-Loose papers-Addition is deleted. [S.69C]

Rajinder Kumar v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 261 / 243 DTR 297 / 38 NYPTTJ 776 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Information from Investigation wing-Foreign Bank-The assessee has accepted the relevant documents as genuine-Not necessary to follow the procedure laid down in S. 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872-Admissible as evidence-Deposits in HSBC London-Income from other sources-Art. 23(3) of Indo-UK DTAA is not automatically applicable-DTAA-India-UK-Bank account showed closed status-Notional interest income cannot be estimated. [S. 90, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S.65B, Art. 23(3)]