Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sunny Jacob Jewellers Gold Hyper Market v. CIT (2025) 473 ITR 159 (Ker.) (HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-No incriminating material is found-The Assessing Officer (AO) can only reopen assessments for the block period of six years if incriminating material related to each specific year is found during the search and not otherwise-Order of Tribunal is set aside. [S. 132, 158BB, 260A]

PCIT v. Shri Satya Prakash Gupta (2024) 473 ITR 515 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Additions unsustainable in the absence of incriminating material for unabated assessments-No addition can be made-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 132, 133A, 153C, 260A]

Wavy Construction LLP v. ACIT (2025) 473 ITR 1 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-When there is no finding or direction in terms of clause (i) of sub-section (6) of Section 153, the extended time shall be 60 days, as specified in the first proviso to Explanation 1 of Section 153, rather than 12 months-Direction-Inconsequence of-To give effect to-Finding-Assessment order is barred by limitation. [S. 143(3) 144B, 147, 148, 153(3)(ii), 153(6), 260,Income Tax Act, 1922, S. 34(3), Art. 226]

Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd. v. Dy. ACIT (2025) 473 ITR 148 (Bom.) (HC)

S.151A : Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment-Notices under section 148 must be issued in a faceless manner through automated allocation as per section 151A and the notification dated 29-3-2022. The Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) lacks the authority to issue such notices, rendering them illegal and invalid. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Sprite Investment (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 166 taxmann.com 156 / 432 ITR 342 (Bom)(HC)

S.151A : Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment-Reassessment-Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of Faceless Officer held to be without jurisdiction [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

PCIT Central v. Capital Power Systems Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 481 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 150: Assessment-Order on appeal-Conditions set out in S. 150 are required to be fulfilled for invoking S. 150 for issuance of notice under S. 148 beyond the period stipulated under S. 149-Appeal of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 148, 254(1), 260A]

Bhoomi Viral Shah v. ITO (2024) 473 ITR 574 (Bom.) (HC) Editorial: This decision is prior to the Apex Court’s judgment of UOI v. Rajeev Bansal (2024)469 ITR 46/ 301 ITR 238 (SC) (dated 3 October 2024.)

S. 149 : Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Provisions of relevant assessment year applicable for reassessment proceedings. [S. 147 148,149(1)(b), Art. 226]

Banyan Real Estate Fund Mauritius v. ACIT (IT) (2024) 165 taxmann.com 210 /(2025) 473 ITR 466 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Incorrect premise-Reassessment notice based on incorrect assumption of non-filing of return-Held to be invalid-Order cannot be justified on basis of reasons supplied subsequently-DTAA-India-Mauritius [S. 9, 147,148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 13(4), Art. 226]

Nalinaksha Sarma v. UOI (2025) 473 ITR 257 (Gauhati) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-No opportunity of being heard-Violation of principles of natural justice-Reassessment notice u/s 148 and order u/s 148A(d) quashed [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1)(a), 149(1)(b)]

Genpact Luxembourg S. A. R. L. v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 473 ITR 68 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-The interest income received from Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) was appropriately taxed under section 194LD, and could not be characterized as dividend liable for Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under section 115-O-Nexus between material relied on and formation of belief is necessary-Recorded reasons cannot be substituted-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S.115O, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 194LD, Art. 226]