Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


DCIT v. Shree Rupanandham Steel (P.) Ltd. (2024) 207 ITD 115 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application money-Substantial turnover-Established genuineness of transaction-Addition is deleted. [S.56(2)(viib), 131]

Saptagiri Pattina Souharda Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha. v. ITO (2024) 207 ITD 41 (Bang) (Trib.)

S. 57 : Income from other sources-Deductions-Interest-Cost of funds on interest income-Matter remanded.[S. 56, 80P(2)(a)(i)]

PRL Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 207 ITD 753 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Share premium-Real estate-Assessing Officer had not rejected valuation report duly prepared under rule 11UA-Addition is deleted.[S.56(2)(viib), R.11UA]

Mahesh Ramkrishna Bhingare. v. JCIT (2024) 207 ITD 694 (Nagpur) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Agricultural lands-Within statutory tolerance margin of 10 per cent-Addition is deleted.[S.56(2)(vii)]

ITO v. Solitaire BTN Solar (P.) Ltd. (2024) 207 ITD 574 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Deeming provisions of section 56(2)(viib) is not applicable to subscriptions by holding companies-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [S.56(2)(viib), R.11UA (1)©]

DCIT v. Weldon Polymers (P.) Ltd. (2024) 207 ITD 517 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Allotted 5 percent non-cumulative redeemable preference shares-Share premium-DCF Method-Report from Merchant banker-Valuation report deserved to be given status of statutory evidence with burden upon Assessing Officer to rebut same with evidences establishing either report was based on incorrect facts and figures, or otherwise, valuation method lacked sanctity to be considered as statutory evidence-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 56(2) (viib), R.11UA]

DCIT v. Ravi Shankar Gupta. (2024) 207 ITD 406 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Purchase consideration for transferring immovable property-Late father in the year 1991 and 1992-Value as on date of agreement should only be compared with actual consideration for purpose of section 56(2)(vii)(b)-Unexplained investment-Difference between stamp value of subject property and actual purchase consideration is only deemed/notional income, same could not be brought with meaning of unexplained investment under section 69. [S.56(2((vii(b), 69]

Kusum Jayram Thakur Dhutum. v. ITO (2024) 207 ITD 237 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Interest-Enhanced compensation-Interest received under section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on enhanced compensation granted by reference court on acquisition of land is not taxable under section 56(2)(viii) [S. 10(37) 56(2)(viii), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 28]

Pooja Dipen Joshi. v. ITO (2024) 207 ITD 34/ 232 TTJ 34 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Stamp duty-Actual sale consideration-Amendment to section 56(2)(vii)(b) made by Finance Act, 2013 with effect from 1-4-2014-Not clarificatory in nature and would be applicable only with effect from 1-4-2014 and not for assessment year 2012-13.[S. 50C, 56(2)(vii(b), 69, 147]

ITO v. Jhaveri Sandeep Bipinchandra (HUF) (2024) 207 ITD 622 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S.54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Majority of investment was made subsequent to due date of filing of return-Exemption is allowed.[S.45, 139(1), 139(4)]