Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Rosha Alloys (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 357 / 127 ITR 76 / 175 taxmann.com 622 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-bogus purchases-Addition unsustainable where purchases, movement of goods and consumption are fully evidenced. [S. 145]

Estate Investment Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 585 (Mum)(Trib).

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Search & seizure-Addition based solely on employee’s diary and retracted statements-Not sustainable. (S. 132, 132(4A) 153A)

Jamna Dass Nikkamal Jain Saraf (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 473 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Seized Papers-Where seized rough sheets substantially tally with the regular books of account, only unexplained differences can be sustained and not the entire addition. [S.132, 145(3)]

DCIT v. Santosh Trust (2025) 238 TTJ 237 / 178 taxmann.com 31 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Cash deposits during demonetisation-Addition was deleted where source stood explained from regular books [S. 115BBE]

Suresh Kumar Banthia v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 130 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Survey-Addition based on dumb documents seized from third parties deleted.[S. 133A]

ACIT v. Chhattisgarh Distilleries Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 774 / 177 taxmann.com 257 (Raipur)(Trib.)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Undisclosed Income-Loose papers-Addition based on dumb documents-Addition was deleted.[S.69C, 132, 153A]

Rajnish Kasturchand Ostwal v. ITO (IT) (2025) 238 TTJ 737 / (2026) 216 ITD 24 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Non-Resident Indian-Investment in property out of foreign salary remitted through NRE account cannot be assessed under section 69. [S. 5(2)]

Ayesha Steels (P) Ltd v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 942 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits-Cash deposit in bank-Demonetisation-Cash sales-Books of account not rejected-Figures of sales have been depicted in VAT return-Addition is deleted-Section 115BBE is applicable to transactions on or after 1st April, 2017.[S. 115BBE]

Sharad Maheshwari v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 1055 (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 68: Cash credits-Gift from sister-Creditworthiness and genuineness proved-Addition deleted.

Ashok Panwar (HUF) v. ACIT (2025) 238 TTJ 681 (Jodhpur)(Trib.) Ashok Panwar. ACIT (2025) 238 TTJ 681 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)

S.68: Cash credits-Bogus long-term capital gains-Genuine share transactions through stock exchange, demat account and banking channels cannot be treated as bogus in the absence of incriminating evidence. [S. 45 69C]