Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Indira Uppal (Miss) v. UOI (2022) 447 ITR 683/ 289 Taxman 487 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Relative-Definition of reactive under two different Acts-Writ petition dismissed-Interpretation of taxing statute-Legislative function-Causus Omisus-Not created by interpretation. [S. 2(41), Art, 226, Maintenance and Welfare of parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, S. 2(g), 23]

Samuel v. CBDT (2022) 447 ITR 708 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation
Transfer of immovable property-If the guideline value was more than the value declared in the document, then the guideline value was relevant for payment of tax, and whether the assessee had received the amount was of no consequence. As long as a sale was effected the assessee was bound by section 50C of the Act. [S. 45, Art. 226]

CIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 1) (2022) 447 ITR 377 (Ker.)(HC) PCIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 1) (2022) 447 ITR 397 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Contribution of employees to provident fund and employees State Insurance-Delay in payment-Not allowable as deduction-Deductions allowable only if contributions paid within due date prescribed in statutes. 2(24)(x), 36(1)(va)]

PCIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (No. 3) (2022) 447 ITR 431 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 43A : Rate of exchange-Foreign currency-Foreign exchange fluctuation gain-Capital receipt-On actual realization to be adjusted against cost of asset.

Ishwardas Sons v. CIT (2022) 447 ITR 755/ 220 DTR 94 /329 CTR 689 / 289 Taxman 620(SC)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Turnover tax-Liberty to assessee to prove that no deduction claimed for earlier assessment years-Direction to Assessing Officer to rectify assessment order. [S. 43B, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Future First Info. Services Pvt. Ltd. (2022)447 ITR 299/(2023) 290 Taxman 490 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Remuneration to director-Shortfall in tax deduction at source-No disallowance can be made-Proper course of action is invoke section 201 of the Act. [S. 37(1), 40A(2)(b), 197(1), 201]

Peerless Hospitex Hospital and Research Center Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 447 ITR 60 / 326 CTR 249 / 213 DTR 81 / 287 Taxman 711 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenditure prohibited by law-Amounts paid by Hospitals as referrals to Doctors-Not deductible-Interpretation of taxing statutes-Interpretation taking into account intention of legislature-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226, General Clauses Act, 1897, S. 2(38), Indian Penal Code, 1860, S. 43, Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, R. 6.8]

PCIT v. Jubilant Foodworks Ltd. (2022) 447 ITR 29 (All.)(HC) Editorial : Dy. CIT v. Jubilant Foodworks Ltd. (2022) 93 ITR 1 (Delhi)(Trib), affirmed.

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Expenditure on improvements in leased premises to run fast food business-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

PCIT. v. Ennoble Construction (2022) 447 ITR 444 / 220 DTR 95 / 329 CTR 923(Karn.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Books of account and documents in custody of Central Bureau of Investigation-Assessing Officer has power and duty to requisition documents from another Public Authority-Disallowance of expenditure is not valid-Findings of Tribunal cannot be interfered with unless perverse or illegal. [S. 131, 260A]

PCIT v. Elel Hotels and Investments Ltd. (2022) 447 ITR 92/ 220 DTR 478/(2023) 332 CTR 870 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Order of Tribunal in PCIT v. Elel Hotels and Investments Ltd. (2022) 28 ITR (Trib)-OL 616 (Delhi)(Trib.), affirmed.

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Owner of Hotel-Compensation paid towards termination of agreement to receive back possession of building, furniture and fixtures-Allowable as revenue expenditure.