S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Excess cost of acquisition of property-Question of fact-Alternative remedy-Directed to file an appeal.Directions for maintenance of status qua subject to payment of 10 percent of demand . [S. 143(3), 147, Art. 226]

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Construction and development of property-Project completion method-Principle of consistency-Not justified in adopting percentage completion method.

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Personal hearing request was rejected-Order was quashed and set aside-Matter remanded back to Assessing Officer for a fresh decision. [S. 143(3),144B(7)(vii), Art. 226]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Technical difficulties-Order passed without granting an opportunity of hearing with sufficient time-Order was set aside. [S. 80P, 144 147, Art. 226]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Not granting personal hearing-Unexplained investments-Mutual funds-Joint names-Factual dispute-Pendency of appeal-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 69, 156, 246A, Art, 226]

S. 139 : Return of income-Condonation of delay-litigation between promoters and investors-Beyond control of assessee-PCIT and Additional CIT recommending condonation of delay-Rejection of application by CBDT was set aside by High Court was affirmed. [S. 119(1), 119(2)(b), Art, 136, 226]

S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Udaipur to Delhi-Opportunity of hearing not granted-Transfer order was set aside. [Art. 226]

S. 115JB : Book profit-Disallowance made under section 14A could not be added for the purpose of computing book profits. [S. 14A]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Most appropriate method-Manufacturing and trading of dental products and trading activity-95% trading and 5% manufacturing-Tribunal adopting RPM as MAM to benchmark transaction is held to be justified. [S. 260A]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparability factors-Profit Margin/Profit Level Indicator-An enquiry under rule 10B(3) ought to be carried out, to determine as to whether material differences between assessee and said entity can be eliminated and unless such differences cannot be eliminated, entity should be included as a comparable. [R. 10B]