Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Mylan Laboratories Ltd v. Addl .JCIT (2022)446 ITR 734 / 287 Taxman 40// 220 DTR 105/ 329 DTR 502 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 32: Depreciation –Good will- Order of Tribunal – Binding precedent – Decision of Tribunal is binding unless there is stay [ 144C , 254(1) , Art , 226 ]

Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. NFAC (2022)446 ITR 734 / 287 Taxman 40 // 220 DTR 105/ 329 DTR 502(Telangana) (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Draft assessment order — Depreciation – Binding precedent – Decision of Supreme Court binding on all Courts and all authorities- Appellate Tribunal – Decision of Tribunal is binding on all authorities [ S. 32, 144C ,(8), 254(1) , Art , 226 ]

Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. NFAC (2022) 446 ITR 734 / 287 Taxman 40 /220 DTR 105/ 329 DTR 502 (Telangana)(HC)

Interpretation-Binding precedent-Decision of Supreme Court binding on all Courts and all authorities-Appellate Tribunal-Decision of Tribunal is binding on all authorities. [S. 144C, 254(1), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Wipro Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 1 / 216 DTR 1 / 327 CTR 381/ 288 Taxman 491 / 140 taxmann.com 223 (SC)

Interpretation of taxing statutes–Literal construction-Exemption provisions-Assessee Must Strictly Comply With Conditions. [[S. 10B(5), 10B(8), 72, 80, 139(1), 139(3), 139(5)]

G. P. Engineering Works Kachhwa v. UOI (2022) 446 ITR 563 // ( 2023) 332 CTR 104/ 224 DTR 257/ ( 2023) 332 CTR 104/ 224 DTR 257(All.) (HC)

S. 279 : Offences and prosecutions-Sanction-Chief Commissioner-Commissioner-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Application for compounding of offences-Limitation-Show-cause notice issued for rejection of compounding of offences on ground of Bar of limitation relying on Circular issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular cannot override statutory provision-Authority to consider application in accordance with law. [S. 276C, 277, 278B, 279(2), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Universal Music India Pvt. Ltd. (2022)446 ITR 287 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Issue not referred in the notice of revision-Order of revision on such issue-Not valid. [S. 40A(2)(b)]

CIT v. Accel Limited (2022) 446 ITR 47 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Formula not applicable to AY. 2002-03-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 14A,R. 8D]

Goa Carbon Ltd. v. JCIT (2022) 446 ITR 590 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Valuation of stock-Valuation adopted by Revenue valid-No question of law. [S. 145]

PCIT v. Utech Developers Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 198/ 289 Taxman 259 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Interest on borrowed capital-Travel expenses-Question of fact-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 36(1)(iii), 37(1)]

PCIT v. Phoenix Lamps Ltd. (No. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 415 (Delhi)(HC) PCIT v. Phoenix Lamps Ltd. (No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 417 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Jurisdiction-Registered Office at Bangalore-Appeal filed at Delhi is not maintainable-Liberty is given to file appeal having jurisdiction.