Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Genpact India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)468 ITR 378 / 160 taxmann.com 268 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Non-Functionality of Department’s Portal-Amalgamation-Delay was not attributable to assessee-Entitled to additional interest-Interpretation of Taxing Statutes-Application of principles of equity. [S.153(5), 244A(1), 250, Art. 226]

Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 468 ITR 5/ 158 taxmann.com 63 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, ITO v. Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd(2024) 468 ITR 10(SC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Failure to furnish approval of Designated Authority along with reasons recorded-Non application of mind-Notice and order disposing of objections is set aside.[S. 147, 148, Art. 226]

Balkrishna Barsha Sutar v. ITO (2024)468 ITR 348 (Bom)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice issued after four or three years-Specified Authority for approval-Approval granted by Joint Commissioner-The authority statutorily empowered to confer approval would be the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner-Notice and reassessment proceedings invalid.[S. 147, 148,148A(b), 148A(d), 151(ii)-Taxation And Other Laws (Relaxation And Amendment Of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3. Art. 226]

Abhinav Jindal HUF v. ITO (2024)468 ITR 787/ 166 taxmann.com 536 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice issued after four or three years-Specified Authority for approval-Approval granted by Joint Commissioner-The authority statutorily empowered to confer approval would be the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner-Notice and reassessment proceedings invalid.[S. 147, 148,-Taxation And Other Laws (Relaxation And Amendment Of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3. Art. 226]

ITO v. Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (2024)468 ITR 10/301 Taxman 399 (SC) Editorial : Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2024) 468 ITR 5/ 158 taxmann.com 63 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Failure to furnish approval of designated authority Order of High Court quashing the proceedings is quashed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 136]

Vodafone Idea Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2024)468 ITR 346 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice after three years-Sanction of Specified Authority-Approval to be obtained from Principal Chief Commissioner-Approval from Principal Commissioner-Sanction is invalid-Order and consequent notice is invalid. [S.147, 148,148A(b), 148A(d), 151(ii), Art.226]

Venkataramana Reddy Patloola v. Dy. CIT (2024)468 ITR 181 / 167 taxmann.com 411 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-International tax charges-Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers and consequent proceedings and orders set aside-Revenue is given liberty to proceed in accordance with new procedure. [S.144B, 147, 148, 148A, 151A, Art. 226]

Mittal Pigments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2024)468 ITR 342 (Raj)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Pendency of appeal-Scrutiny assessment order pending in appeal rendered infructuous-Order passed under section 148A(d) is held to be valid-Assessee is given liberty to seek appropriate remedy if adverse reassessment order is passed.[S. 143(3), 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 250, Art. 226

Excel Commodity and Derivative Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI (2024)468 ITR 21 (Cal)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Loan-Non-consideration of explanation-Duty of Assessing Officer to consider assessee’s Explanation and pass reasoned order-Non application of mind-Notice and order is quashed and set aside. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Jugal Kishore Lohiya v. PCIT (2024)468 ITR 288 (Raj)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice after three years-Limitation-Income exceeding Rs 50 lakhs-Process for issuance of notice started before date of notification-Order and consequent notice is valid. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 149,Art. 226]