Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT(E) v. Vidya Bharati Society for Educational & Scientific Advancement. (2022) 447 ITR 732/ 285 Taxman 659 / 210 DTR 193 / 325 CTR 570 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution-Bogus donation-Cancellation of registration was set aside. [S. 12AA(3)]

CIT v. Wipro Ltd. (2022) 134 taxmann.com 301 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed; CIT v. Wipro Ltd. (2022) 285 Taxman 274 (SC)

S. 10A : Free trade zone-Set-off losses of STP/SEZ unit against income of non-STP units-Allowed to be set off-Export turnover-Deemed export, reimbursement of expenses, expenses incurred in foreign currency, delayed export proceeds and VAT/GST would form part of export turnover-Corporate office expenses-Allowed on ad hoc percentage of 20 percent and not based on turnover of various undertakings for purpose of deductions under section 10A.[S. 80IB, 80IC]

EY Global Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 54 / 285 Taxman 10 / 209 DTR 1 / 324 CTR 149 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Providing access to computer software to Indian comoany-Not royalty-Not liable to be taxed in India-DTAA-India-UK. [Art. 13, Copy right Act, 1957, S. 14, Art. 226]

CIT v. Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (2022) 285 Taxman 491 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest-Interest accrued had to be utilized only for purpose of scheme-Not assessable as revenue receipt.

Bank of India v. ACIT (Mum) (Trib) www.itatonline .org

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals ) -Procedure -Faceless Appeal Scheme – Video Conference -Natural justice – Opportunity for personal hearing not granted – Retrospective effect- Order set aside and remanded back. [ S. 250(6B) , National Faceless Appeals Scheme 2020, Rule 12(2), 12(3), 13(2) ]

DCIT v. Marubeni Corporation, Japan ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Permanent establishment – Interest will not be taxed at a higher rate- DTAA- India- Japan . [ Art, 7, 11(2)(11(6), 14 ]

Shinhan Bank v. DCIT (2022) 218 TTJ 401 / 217 DTR 113 /139 taxmann. com 563 (Mum) ( Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 90: Double taxation relief – Foreign Company – discrimination allowed – Company has not made prescribed arrangement-DTAA-India -Korea . [ S. 2(22A), Art, 25(1)]

Shapoorji Pallonji Bumi Armada Pvt Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 139 taxmann. com 572 ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel – Rectification application by TPO – Rectification order by DRP – Not maintainable. [ S. 144C(14), 154 ]

PCIT v. Emarsso Exports Private Limited ( Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court -Delay in disposal of appeals – Change in Panel counsels – CIT(judicial) to make necessary arrangements in two weeks.

Yashovardhan Birla v. CIT(A), 213 TTJ 904 / 207 DTR 297 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 10(1) : Assessment-Notice under section 10(1) jurisdictionally defective and violative of the principles of natural justice on account of simultaneous proceedings under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 and Income-Tax Act, 1961-Order was quashed. [S. 2(11). 4(3), 14, 59].