S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)-Issue was not subject matter of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)-Book profit-Revision is valid-Revisionary order passed by Commissioner under section 263 could not be said to be without jurisdiction merely because document identification number (DIN) of order was intimated one day after said order was passed. [S. 9(1)(vii), 115JB, 250, 263(1)(c), Art. 226]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Deduction of tax at source-Contractors/sub-contractor-Cash payment-Survey-Tribunal was justified in quashing revisionary proceedings on ground that order passed by AO was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to interest of revenue. [S. 40(a)(ia), 40A(3), 194C, R.6DD]

S. 260A : Decision of Court-High Court-Delay of 535 days-Condonation of delay was allowed.

S. 255 : Appellate Tribunal-Appointment of Member-Waiting list-Appointed pursuant directions of Apex Court-Shall be entitled for consideration of notional seniority and other consequential benefits-Entitled to pay only from date of his assuming charge. [Art. 32, 226, 227]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Limitation-Share capital-Cash credits-Revision-Lack of enquiry-Appeal dismissed on the ground that issues raised in appeals were covered by several orders passed by Tribunal-Not dealt with merits-Matter was sent back to Tribunal to take a decision [S. 68, 260A,263]

S. 252 : Appellate Tribunal-Members-Qualification-Appointment of Members Contempt-Not appointing the members of the Tribunal-Recommendations of the Search cum selection commission-Before recommendations are formulated and in exceptional cases where certain material comes to light after submission of recommendations, that must also be drawn to attention of SCSC so as to enable it to consider whether any modification of its recommendations is necessary. [Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, S. 3]

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Directed to deposit 10 percent of outstanding demand. [S. 220(6), 246A, Art. 226]

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Deposited 20 percent of demand-Pendency of stay application-Recovered entire amount in a ex parte manner-Assessing Officer was directed to refund excess amount already recovered from assessee and he would be entitled to keep only 20 per cent of demand until appeal was decided. [Art. 226]

S. 194J : Deduction at source-Fees for professional or technical services-Not liable to deduct TDS on telecom service provider, on payment of interconnect user charges as it could not be categorized as fee for technical services. [S. 9(1)(vii), 201]

S. 194J : Deduction at source-Fees for professional or technical services-Supply of rolling stock-Payment to consortium not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 201(IA)]