Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dinesh Kumar Goyal, HUF v. ITO.(No. 1) (2024)461 ITR 111 / 161 taxmann.com 584 (Cal)(HC) Editorial : Dinesh Kumar Goyal, HUF v. ITO.(No. 2) (2024)461 ITR 113 (Cal)(HC), decision of single judge is reversed.

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-No violation of principles of natural justice.-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art.226]

Packirisamy Senthilkumar v. Government Of India [2024] 461 ITR 473 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order based on New reasons-Adequate opportunity should be provided-Order is set aside.[S.144B, 148, 148A(b), Art.226]

Packirisamy Senthilkumar v. Government Of India [2024] 461 ITR 473 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order based on New reasons-Adequate opportunity should be provided-Order is set aside.[S.144B, 148, 148A(b), Art.226]

Abhishek Caplease Pvt. Ltd. v ITO (2024)461 ITR 261/ 161 taxmann.com 40 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP rejected,ITO v. Abhishek Caplease Pvt. Ltd (2024] 298 Taxman 449 /461 ITR 263 (SC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Intimated to Assessing Officer and duly acknowledged- Notice issued to non-existent company is unsustainable.[S. 147, Art. 226]

Devendra (legal heir of Vasudeo Damduji Jambhulkar) v. Addl. Jt. CIT [2024] 461 ITR 463 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued in the name of deceased-Not enforceable in law-legal heirs submitted proof of death of assessee-Notice is null and void. [S. 147, 292BB, Art.226]

Pravinchandra A Shah v. UOI [2024] 461 ITR 307/[2023] 154 taxmann.com 616 (Guj)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Dead Person-Notice in the name of deceased assessee-Intimation by the legal heir to the Assessing Officer informing the notice is dead-Second notice in the name of legal heir-Reassessment order in the name of deceased is not curable defects-Notice and order is quashed.[S. 147, 292B 292BB, Art. 226]

ITO v. Abhishek Caplease Pvt. Ltd. (2024)461 ITR 263 /298 Taxman 449 (SC) Editor : Abhishek Caplease Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2024) 461 ITR 261 (Guj)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment- Notice- Amalgamation-Intimated to Assessing Officer-Notice issued to non-existent company is unsustainable- Special Leave Petition dismissed.[S. 147, Art.136]

FCB Interface Communications Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 461 ITR 406 (P&H)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Depreciation-No failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32, 148, Art. 226]

FCB Interface Communications Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 461 ITR 406 (P&H)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Depreciation-No failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32, 148, Art. 226]

Prabhat Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)461 ITR 390 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Internal information-No live link between material and belief- Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 143(3), 148, Art. 226, Evidence Act, 1872, S.103]