Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


R. Venkata Dhana Lakshmi v. ITO (2021) 89 ITR 28 (SN) (Vishakha) (Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Consideration from sale of land as long term-Transfer of superstructure as short term capital gains-Deposit in specified Bank account and using it only for acquiring new asset Eligible for deduction-Not making claim in return-Appellate Authorities not barred from entertaining fresh claim. [S. 54F, 254(1)]

Armatic Engineering (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 89 ITR 10 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Joint development agreement-General power of attorney-Possession and complete control of share of property-Part performance of contract-Transfer complete on handing over possession and not on date of Registration-Exemption for reinvestment of consideration is eligible. [S. 2(47)(v), 50C, 54G, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S. 53A]

Dy. CIT(IT) v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. (2021) 89 ITR 56 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 44BB : Mineral oils-Presumptive tax-Amount received on account of equipment lost in hole-Reimbursement of service tax-Not to be included in gross receipts for computation of profits for purpose of presumptive tax.

Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 212 TTJ 1010 / 204 DTR 347 / (2022) 192 ITD 142 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 43B : Certain deductions only on actual payment-Interest payable to Government of India is crystalized based on facts, even though not accounted in books due to comments of statutory auditor, and hence is allowed as expense on accrual basis even not accounted for in books. [S. 145]

Ken Consulting P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 89 ITR 2 (SN) (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Service tax liability-Not claimed as deduction-Outstanding service tax liability not liable to be added.

Emerson Climate Technologies (India) P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2021) 89 ITR 69 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-Education Cess-Allowable as deduction-Transfer pricing adjustment-Matter remanded. [S. 37(1), 92C]

DCIT v. Pfizer Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 198 DTR 273 / 210 TTJ 908 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Contractor-Disallowance section is not warranted where the payee furnishes the return of income taking into account the sum(s) received from the payer, tax due on the return income has been paid and certificate of a Chartered Accountant to that effect has been furnished. [S. 194C]

Kiran Infertility Central Private Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 89 ITR 434 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Running infertility clinic carrying out in vitro Fertilisation-Payee not maintaining proper accounts-Disallowance is held to be justified. [S. 194C]

Kiran Infertility Central Private Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 89 ITR 434 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Fes for technical services-Payment per head is not in excess of threshold limit-Not liable to deduct tax at source [S. 91(1)(vii), 194J]

Sir Pratap Heritage Hotels (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 209 TTJ 1 (UO) (Jodhpur)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-The expenditure necessary to maintain Assessee’s corporate personality would be an allowable expenditure even when no business was undertaken.