Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Gouthamchand Jain v. ITO ( Chennai )( Trib ) www.itatonline .org

S. 68: Cash credits – Cash deposited – Demonetisation- Explained the source – Explanation cannot be rejected on the ground of after thought – Addition is deleted .

Lok Vikas Housing Funds Ltd v. Add. CIT(2023) 223 TTJ 746 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Cash transactions between group company-Common cashier-Book entries-Reasonable cause-Penalty is deleted. [S. 269SS, 269T, 271E, 273B]

Namdhari Rice & General Mills v. PCIT(2023) 221 TTJ 784 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Lack of enquiry-Sales through NSEL-Alleged out of book sales-NSEL has not responded to the letter issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 133(6)-Possible view-Revision is bad in law and quashed. [S. 133(6), 143(3)]

O. S. Motors (P) Ltd v. PCIT(2023) 222 TTJ 27(UO)(Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Lack of enquiry-Contribution to Provident fund and ESI-Justified in setting aside the order-Incentive payments-Commission-Tax deduction at source-Not justified in revising the order-Exempt income-Debatable issue-Revision order is set aside. [S. 14A, 36(1) (v), 139(1), 192, 194H]

Gurucharan Singh v. PCIT(2023) 223 TTJ 53 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash deposit-Demonetisation-No lack of proper enquiry-Proper explanation was furnished in the course of assessment proceedings-Revision order is quashed. [S. 68, 143(3)]

Dhanraj Chhipa v. PCIT(2023) 223 TTJ 620 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash deposited in the bank-Demonetisation-Possible view-Examined in the course of assessment-Revision order is quashed. [S. 68, 144]

Jaipur Telecom (P) Ltd v. PCIT(2023) 223 TTJ 599 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Delay of 932 days is condoned-Merger-Appeal against quantum appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A)-Revision of order is bad in law. [S. 253(5), 250]

Reliance Industrial Investment & Holdings Ltd v. Dy. CIT(2023) 233 TTJ 769 / 149 taxmann. com 113 ((Mum)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Fully convertible debentures-Transition amount-Accounting Standard 32-As per terms, would be of a fixed number of equity shares, criteria to classify financial instrument of convertible debentures were not indicative of any compounding financial instrument albeit it was equity-There would not be any transition amount requiring any adjustment in book profit as per section 115JB(2C)-No adjustment is required in the book profit by way of transition amount-Revision order is reversed. [S. 115JB(2C), 143(3)]

Salarpuria Properties (P) Ltd v. PCIT (2023) 223 TTJ 644 (Kol)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessment quashed by Tribunal-Revision order is bad in law. [S. 143(3), 153A]

Tata NYK Shipping Pte. Ltd v. CIT(IT) (2023) 223 TTJ 1 / 155 taxmann. com 345 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Lack of enquiry-Operating ships in international traffic-valid Tax Resident Certificate-Revision is not valid-DTAA-India-Singapore. [S. 9(1)(vi), 44B,143(3), art, 7, 8]